English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-11 12:20:13 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Education & Reference Words & Wordplay

My boyfriend said that a forest is all trees and that the woods has more underbrush. I said they are the samething and "woods" is a slang term.

2007-08-11 12:44:12 · update #1

could it have to do with size?

2007-08-11 12:50:58 · update #2

5 answers

Usual terminology uses Forest to denote a large area covered by trees and other vegetation, and is home to many species of living creatures. A wood, or the woods is generally used to mean a small area containing the same things. They are both the same, but local dialects use them in different ways. A walk in the forest usually conjers a picture of giant redwoods in my mind, whereas a walk in the woods gives me an image of smaller more densely spaced trees of many species.

2007-08-11 13:37:40 · answer #1 · answered by Dondi 7 · 0 0

I'm not sure there is much difference, though I always thought a forest covered much more land and was older growth than a woods. A wood. The woods.
That's the only difference I go by when I describe one or the other.
My pathetic dictionary doesn't say. (I've called my dictionary pathetic so often, a change had got to happen soon! :-} )

2007-08-11 19:40:26 · answer #2 · answered by LK 7 · 0 0

trust me...i live in the woods!!!...or the forest ...whatever way you want to call it....it`s all about the closeness of the trees. they are one and the same...altho, i perfer the term woods.

2007-08-11 21:50:28 · answer #3 · answered by heather h 5 · 0 0

not much.

its usually just the context. woods is more casual.

2007-08-11 19:27:28 · answer #4 · answered by Caty 3 · 0 0

same

2007-08-11 22:34:32 · answer #5 · answered by Manz 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers