English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

alongside the other famous presidents that are carved into stone in the bla hills of south dakota?!!!

2007-08-11 12:12:03 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

jan m, your not one of his daughters are ya!!

2007-08-18 15:13:25 · update #1

i wont tell i promise!!!

2007-08-18 15:13:53 · update #2

17 answers

A mountain of dog crap, sure......

2007-08-19 08:15:03 · answer #1 · answered by kajun 5 · 1 0

No, and I'm not to happy about the other presidents being on Mount Rushmore either. That land was sacred to the Sioux and now it has 4 white guys carved into it. And the irony is that none of Presidents on Mt. Rushmore were the kind of egomaniacs who would have approved of having their heads carved into a mountain.

2007-08-11 14:55:29 · answer #2 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 1 1

No. It would be easier to slam it against it or bounce it off the top a couple times and that wouldnt' ruin the mountain any. But if he were carved in the other carvings would probably crumble.

2007-08-11 12:21:15 · answer #3 · answered by MyMysteryId 3 · 2 1

Well... no, i don't think so.
You see, they should have a nicer-looking person carved into the mountain.
Me, for example.
Even though I'm not American, I'm still better than George.
BUT DON'T TELL HIM I SAID THAT.
he'll get mad at me again, and throw me into the cupboard under the stairs. and not let me have any food for a week.

2007-08-18 14:41:47 · answer #4 · answered by Jan m 2 · 2 0

Bush's head needs to be carved to see what type of tumor is between his ears. Then his head should be removed from his shoulder, placed into a jar and sealed, then buried at Chernobyl.

2007-08-11 16:38:48 · answer #5 · answered by jmf931 6 · 1 1

Anyone who destroys this many evil doers should definitely be on a mountain.

2007-08-19 09:29:08 · answer #6 · answered by superbad 1 · 0 1

He declared the "War on mountains" a few years ago, so i don't think it will be there much longer.

2007-08-11 12:15:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

By all means...he's not using it for anything else. Let's put it on a mountain...(or a stick)...
*

2007-08-11 18:53:37 · answer #8 · answered by dreadneck 4 · 1 1

I think Reagans head should go on there first, then Bush's.

2007-08-18 20:31:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

HELL No.......I thought that only admired Presidents were on Mount Rushmore.

2007-08-11 12:23:42 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

Yes, Bush's head should be carved.

wait, what was the rest of your question?

2007-08-11 12:20:09 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers