To me, a hero is someone who endures hardship and or pain that they wouldn't have to endure. Choosing to keep your baby even though you could just as easily abort or give it up for adoption, for instance. Or conversely, giving your baby up for adoption because you don't believe you're a fit parent for some reason, even though nobody is pressuring you to do so.
One doesn't actually need to -do- anything to be a hero, they just need to be the kind of person who would be willing to if the occasion arose, especially (but not exclusively) if they would act without giving it a second thought.
2007-08-11
12:05:49
·
5 answers
·
asked by
uncleclover
5
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
YoungOldMan - I definitely see where you're coming from, but language is an organic structure, my friend. ;-) Words evolve, they change meaning, they acquire new meanings and certain former meanings go out of date. What I'm seeing referred to as "hero" here used to be called an "everyday hero" - it had a qualifier. But now they're just recognizing the word in all of its intensities under the same label - "hero". :-) I understand the angst over watching one's own language evolve new and unexpected twists and turns, but patience, grasshopper - you were once a linguistic pain in the neck to someone else, too, to be sure. ;-)
2007-08-12
13:00:47 ·
update #1