English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Asexual reproduction would seem a more efficient way to reproduce and avoids all sorts of problems.

Perhaps sexual reproduction has kept in style because it provides a mechanism to weed out harmful mutations that arise in the population.

Are you sure the theory of evolution doesn't explain why "sexual" reproduction is more beneficial for an organism? The ability to adapt to a changing environment has caused sex to remain the method of choice for most living things.

2007-08-11 11:14:44 · answer #1 · answered by michelle 5 · 2 0

I think the only example I can think of at the time is corals (they also sexually reproduce). An entire reef can be created due to asexual reproduction within corals. Reasons for asexual repro in corals include environmental disturbances such as pollution and coral battles where chemical warfare takes place in a reef setting. This will ensure that the colony will live on and in the case of corals, the colony that lives on will have the same DNA as the original. In contrast, I think sexual reproduction is more beneficial in relation to asexual reproduction being prone to mutations in alleles that may affect a population and possibly wipe it out. I guess this is where natural selection comes into play and the best of the best survive. Great question by the way.

2007-08-11 13:49:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

What some people are missing here is that the question asks why asexual reproduction is beneficial for a SINGLE ORGANISM and not for the SPECIES.
If you think about the survival of a SINGLE ORGANISM, asexual reproduction is more efficient because you do not need to search for another individual and it is faster and therefore less expensive in terms of energy.
For a species it is different because, in order to preserve the species in time, you need to acquire variability in the treats, which will confer adaptation to the environment.
I hope I helped you

2007-08-11 21:54:33 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Asexual reproduction only takes one parents and requires no fusion of gametes. Natural selection states that an organism benefits from helpful traits in survival and reproduction and therefore an advantage in traits would increase an organism's chances of competing with other organisms. An asexual organism would not have to find and attract a partner and therefore there would be no competition with rival organisms for mates.

2007-08-11 14:29:20 · answer #4 · answered by ffangelgrl 2 · 0 1

Asexual reproduction is most beneficial only in very stable, long-lasting environments. It insures that exact replicas of organisms very well adapted to that specific environment are produced.
Sexual reproduction is more beneficial in variable environments, or ones that are subject to change, to increase the likelihood that one of the variants produced by the parents will survive in the new conditions.

2007-08-11 11:27:26 · answer #5 · answered by kt 7 · 0 0

Asexual reproduction offers stability. A successful combination is preserved. Asexual reproduction bypasses any need for finding a mate.

Sexual reproduction creates frequent recombinations allowing for faster adaptation.

2007-08-11 11:28:17 · answer #6 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0 1

confident evolution happens. Mutation, organic determination and genetic flow are consistently appearing on organisms. human beings who reproduce asexually, as a replace of complicated relatives timber you could think of one cellular in basic terms branching out. whilst bacteria are attacked by ability of antibiotics, etc, if one cellular has a mutation proof against the substance then the determination would be so super on that cellular that's going to grow to be a extensive colony. this could be a ordinary occasion of replace with the aid of valuable mutations that could happen with the aid of fact bacteria have very very short generations. Evolution can happen over the years in this way. without DNA replace it ability that mutations will in no way go organisms, so evolution without those mass-extinction aspects is incredibly with the aid of threat. Many asexual organisms regardless of the undeniable fact that produce different ability of DNA replace, including bacteria soaking up different plasmids. The evolution of asexual organisms unavoidably led to sexual duplicate and to all existence that exists right this moment.

2016-10-10 00:41:47 · answer #7 · answered by doloris 4 · 0 0

Because the two fold cost of sexual reproduction is avoided. You do not have to find a mate and you do not need double the resources to bring progeny to term.

There are drawbacks to asexual reproduction that your book needs to make you aware of.

2007-08-11 12:05:50 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would imagine that it would be the other way around.

2007-08-11 11:11:55 · answer #9 · answered by Vince M 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers