Since we have thousands of nuclear weapons lying around, who should we nuke next and why?

Question

My votes go to Venezuela, Cuba, and possibly France. What do you guys think?

Answer 1

Well...in reality...if we send ANY nukes ANYWHERE...I am afraid it will set off the famous "MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION" thing that was everybody's FEAR back in the 60s probably ALL the other countries will send THEIR NUKES AT US. YA DIG?

Answer 2

Let's nuke all the countries that never bothered to pay back their debts from WWII.

Ditto to all the countries who were taking bribes from Saddam Hussein to keep voting "no" against military intervention. France comes to mind, if we got rid of the snooty French, then the Seyshelle Islands would be a lot emptier around vacation time, and maybe finally we could get a decent room rate there!

We could use some nice neutron bombs to get rid of irritating people and still leave some buildings standing, in case we want to repopulate the area and install a few McDonalds.

Let's really nuke with a vengeance all those countries that have impossible to learn foreign languages. It makes it so hard to have a pleasant vacation when everyone is yapping in some indescernible tongue.

We could nuke all the cities in Africa and give the wildlife a chance to rebound. Sure will make World Wildlife Fund's job a heck of a lot easier.

I think a mini tactical nuke in Hugo Chavez' palace would be enough to turn that country around.

Cubans have suffered enough under Castro. Let's just let the CIA get creative, and leave that beleaguered island alone.

But North Korea, uhhh...."Fed Ex" will be delivering a package very soon. Please be waiting outside, and ready to sign for it.