2007-08-11 07:52:54 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
John Edwards says "no".
2007-08-11 07:55:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
We haven’t had a bald president in 4 many years, no longer because President Gerald Ford, bear in mind that Ford became under no circumstances elected to be president, or vp for that remember. we ought to flow back 5 many years to President Dwight Eisenhower’s re-election to observe the final time the yankee human beings elected a bald president.
2016-11-12 01:27:51 · answer #2 · answered by weberg 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol
They took the Bald Eagle off the Endangered Species list -
it's a sign!!
2007-08-11 07:55:45 · answer #3 · answered by no one 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I am bald and so I would certainly vote for a bald candidate unless they tried a combover.
2007-08-11 07:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by Gov IT Guy 1 · 4⤊ 0⤋
We have had a few. Look at as recently as President Dwight D. Eisenhower.
2007-08-11 07:57:13 · answer #5 · answered by ALASPADA 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No but I am ready for a president that has some.
2007-08-11 08:00:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
That is great. True, I guess we can say that if you don't vote for Thompson you are a bigot against the follicaly challenged.
2007-08-11 08:00:16 · answer #7 · answered by Dude 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be careful, the PC police will be after you. They want to be called follically challenged.
And criminals are now called morally challenged.
2007-08-11 08:01:30 · answer #8 · answered by USAF, Retired 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Definitely, not.
It is much much, much more important that we have a woman or, a black president first.
(I'm sorry, but the libs called dibs first.)
2007-08-11 07:59:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Hillary is bald?
2007-08-11 07:58:49 · answer #10 · answered by old-bald-one 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋