Barbara Walters questions John Edwards --he knows something about the official 911 story?

Question

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-886644060632694627&hl=en

I am just asking a question people. If you don't want to answer then don't but keep your opinion about why I asked to yourselves

Answer 1

Well going back to that day, Bush was all against an investigation because he swore he knew it was Bin Laden, yet the FBI has nothing @ fbi.gov saying that he was behind it, because there is no hard evidence to prove it. All we have is this blurry confession tape with someone who is righthanded and looks nothing like Bin Laden.

And what other hard core evidence is there. None. British newspapers have reported 8 of the 19 hijackers to be alive and well. And why did NORAD stand down? Especially since they've scrambled jets nearly 100 times in 2000. And what about all the insider trading with PUT options on United and American Airlines? There's way too many questions and no answers because they refuse to answer them.

Answer 2

I'm not sure how easily one could come up with an answer so soon after the 911 attacks, however I do believe that our so called government knew then and know now a lot more about the attacks then they are admitting to.. Its obvious so many people that answer these questions are nothing more than sheeple really. With the modern age of the Internet at our fingertips how can so many people still be so uninformed? Even if 10% of what the so called "conspiracy theorists " say is true, We are in deep **** as a nation. There are unrefutable facts out there that prove our government is lieing to us everyday and has been for almost 100 years. Every piece of information should be looked at with open eyes and researched if there is any doubt. Way too many people just blow things off as paranoia, hysteria, and conspiracy theorists. Today they had an election in Sierra Leone. 90% of the eligible voters turned out. 90%! It is your duty to inform yourselves and vote for a leader that will defend the Constitution and not just use it to wipe their *** on. Wake up America while you still have a say!

Answer 3

I am not sure this is conclusive proof that JE knew anything about the attack. He might have but I dont see it here - this just looks like he is trying to sidestep the question rather then commit. I tend to think that anyone answering these question immediately after the incident woudl probably give the same type of answers.


Too bad they didnt get the interview with President Bush - now there might be an interesting interview (assuming he tells the truth - yeah right - LOL) as I am sure he is dumb enough to let things slip if he is under pressure.

Answer 4

That interview was apparently done the NIGHT after 9/11. How can anyone be surprised that the government was not going to say definitively who was responsible for the attack at that point? It would have been the height of stupidity to make such a statement until all the facts were in. If you are trying to imply something based on that interview, it's a real reach, my friend.

Answer 5

Excuse me but, are you saying that you, over all the people that investigated this 9/11, the thousands of people that have investigated the "towers" found something that was mysteriously involving, out of a simple interview.

Why don't you and all the other gossip mongers, the naysayers and the rumor mill, leave it die. We know what happen, it's over, why keep bringing it up. Leave it die with history. We won't forget in our hearts but, we have to go one.