NOTHING IS ONE IF ONE CANNOT BE THOUGHT AS "PART, WHOLE, EQUIVALENCE, UNIQUENESS, LIMIT, LINK, SENSATION, INFLUENCE, ORIGIN, DERIVATIVE, RULE, CONDITION, INTENT, AND FULFILLMENT."
What is your opinion?
2007-08-10 21:34:38 · 13 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I agree.
2007-08-10 21:42:33 · answer #1 · answered by what u talkin' bout? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In one notion nothing can be the anti universe as one part as its self a whole but only equivalent to its self, one of a kind, limitless, a link to existence in its totality, insensible, in confluence with the total existence, the one space for the total existence is as origin for both the nothing and the universal totality, derivative in concept only, rule-less, condition-less, intent-less but possibly infinitely fulfilled.
2007-08-11 21:30:20 · answer #2 · answered by Psyengine 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sesquipidalian Terminology Obfuscates the Rumination.
2007-08-11 04:44:24 · answer #3 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm sorry. You are thinking this is world is dualist. It isn't a dualist universe. In other words, everything is a one big whole. There are no parts of links, ect.
And i can prove that something is one if we take away the notion of dualism (parts, links, ect.). Everything is one whole. No parts, to make parts is to split the whole into many, which it isn't. And since everything IS that whole, it can not be part on something else.
2007-08-11 08:09:36 · answer #4 · answered by lufiabuu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think this indirect method for defining 'nothing' is the only one available to us since we can not perceive nothing except as an interval between two distinct perceptions assuming the interval denotes absence of perception....... question though is that time can not pass if there was no perception.... very confusing this 'nothingness'!!
2007-08-11 06:09:19 · answer #5 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My opinion is all the above are needed for life to exist in harmony. Or I can say they are qualities of life itself, the qualities that makes each individual so unique but yet interesting.
2007-08-11 04:42:56 · answer #6 · answered by BLUE 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Too much information to absorb .By the time i get to the end of your question i've forgotten the first part.
2007-08-11 08:30:12 · answer #7 · answered by ROBERT P 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it only proves the post-modernism theory of nothingness...everything we do is meaningless such as your question.
2007-08-11 09:32:21 · answer #8 · answered by mirian77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think u hit the caps lock key by mistake
2007-08-11 04:42:13 · answer #9 · answered by Nicholas K 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
This is drivel.
Your list of descriptive qualities are not even all in the same tense. And apart from that the statement has no frame of reference. In other words WTF are you talking about?
2007-08-11 04:44:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
How can one have an opinion about nonsense, except that it is stupid?
2007-08-11 04:38:31 · answer #11 · answered by LodiTX 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋