Of course. I watched that entire trial and everything I heard pointed to him. His money bought him a not guilty plea and he also played the 'race card' which was stupid, because he was the 'whitest' black man I've ever seen, and I don't mean his color, I mean how he lived and who he was married to and hung around with - things like that. Now he's just a poor slob that owes everything he ever makes to the families of the 2 people he murdered and no one cares what color he is any more, lmao!
2007-08-10 18:54:50
·
answer #1
·
answered by The Nana of Nana's 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
Honestly, I really don't know. But from the little I have gleaned about that man it appears that it is a very good possibility that OJ was at least involved in causing those murders.
There were lots of fishy things that happened to him in the beginning, such as that car chase and other things.
2007-08-10 19:17:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by Adel 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes, I believe he was. The part about "If the glove doesn't fit, you must acquit" was total stupidity. I mean they made him put rubber gloves on first, then had him try on the leather gloves. Would you have tried hard to pull those things on if you were being tried for murder? Over something that would have naturally been difficult to pull over rubber anyway? Also, the deep cut on his left hand? And the big car chase in the white Bronco? I'm sorry, I would have voted him guilty if I had been on the jury.
2007-08-10 18:58:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by b_friskey 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I used to think he was guilty until Mark Fuhrman brought OJ's lab test blood to OJ's home and put some on his vehicle and socks. That was really weird to me.
2007-08-10 18:55:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes
2007-08-10 18:52:56
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nico 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
OH NO HE DIDN'T GIRL!!
He was having dinner with Robert Blake, when the killings took place.
I read it in The National Enquirer magazine!!
(Right under Elizabeth Taylor said." She would state her marriage on that one". ;-)
2007-08-10 18:58:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bluelady... 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
He was found not guilty, but I think he's a murderer.
2007-08-10 18:59:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by . 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
The court has aquitted him hence he is not guilty.
2007-08-10 18:54:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Milind Desai 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
Yes. Never had any doubt.
2007-08-10 19:01:13
·
answer #9
·
answered by Mark D 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
My opinion is yes.
2007-08-10 19:10:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by eizus28 7
·
1⤊
0⤋