English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or was Bush lying when he made that claim? My money is on "Bush was lying"... How about you?

2007-08-10 15:39:18 · 10 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

Stephanie (below) {hug}

2007-08-10 15:44:39 · update #1

Scott B (below) Curiously avoided answering the core question concerning Iraqi oil. Hmmmmm

2007-08-10 18:30:56 · update #2

10 answers

i think you are jealous because you didn't think of that idea first.

2007-08-10 15:44:10 · answer #1 · answered by whitelily 3 · 3 3

you extremely need to envision the info in the previous you initiate ranting. in certainty that the U.S. isn't extremely based on Iraqi oil and in certainty would not import it at as quickly as. maximum of it is going to Europe. We might get a small quantity of Iraqi oil by way of distant places materials like the French company, entire S.A., which has a refinery in the U.S. and which takes extremely some oil out of Iraq, yet we don't understand that to be a certainty. Crude oil would not incorporate a pedigree. U.S. forces do safeguard the Iraqi oilfields from terrorist assaults, to help stabilize the rustic, and U.S. oil agencies do, to an exceedingly limited quantity, habit company in Iraq, assisting to locate and convey oil and to maintain the production centers. As you could think of, while you're keen to be functional, U.S. agencies are going to stay away from aspects the place the opportunity of doing rewarding company is a few distance exceeded by way of the possibility and value of doing company with the aid of terrorism and political instability.

2016-11-12 00:09:26 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No he wasn't lying because he thought the war in Iraq would be over in a year or less. Which would have meant the Iraq oil would have been paying for much of the war/reconstruction. He didn't bank on the Iraq war going on for 6 years & more. But that's because he's a dumb a*s

2007-08-10 15:49:26 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What is a "lie-based" war? More liberal fiction? What lie are you referring to? The same intellegence reports available to congress was available to the Pres. and both supported military action. Who lied?

2007-08-10 16:06:51 · answer #4 · answered by Scott B 7 · 0 0

Oh yes I vaguely recall a promise of Iraqi oil will pay for the rebuilding effort. Oh and now I will wait for the cries of "but the terrorists keep disrupting things". Yes it was a lie.

2007-08-10 15:43:34 · answer #5 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 3 4

I don't recall Bush making that claim. But facts aren't really all that important when you're a liberal, are they?

2007-08-10 15:48:15 · answer #6 · answered by Eukodol 4 · 1 1

I wouldn't have believed that theory if haliburton didn't rush right in there. And all wars are caused over natural resources.

2007-08-10 15:45:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Gullible git, there was no lie.

2007-08-11 06:27:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I think your hatred of Bush will catch up with you, is what I think!

2007-08-10 15:48:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

thats my recollection............

2007-08-10 15:47:07 · answer #10 · answered by bo-bo 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers