Do you realize, by this kind of comment you just make a A$$ off yourself? guess not!!
Name one first lady who's not famous!!SEE.....!!
2007-08-10 15:17:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Bill Clinton's infidelities ranged over 20 years and included many dozens of women more than those two. Are we to believe the story line that the marriage is for real? Hillary, a strong feminist who would tolerate dozens and dozens of infedelities- please. Do you really think Hillary would continue a physcial affair or stopped 20 years ago? Only a true liberal would believe the fictional story fed to us by the democratic spin-makers and the liberal media.
Why should we care? Hey, if the Clintons weren't trying to dulplicate an Arkansas Camelot, and embellishing the fraud, it would probably be just another dysfunctional marriage. But, the media and democrats are selling you a pile of manure & guess what? Everything else about the Clinton's is a lie, fraud, deception and a "con"- that's why it matters.
Liberals will say the dozens of scandals, far worse than Bill's infedelities, don't count because they were covered up and justice was cheated, so why go after Bill for a BJ from a girl his daughter's age? Same as jailing mobsters for income tax evasion, you know they were guilty of far worse crimes but stick them for anything that you can.
Good quesiton, why does Monica or Jennifer stand out, when there were 150 others?
The only notoriety Hillary gets from it, she pesonally directed the hits- hiring goons and P.I.'s to physically and personally threaten women, slander them and attack them, from telling the truth about Bill.
Hillary went over the line, advocating N.O.W. to side with Bill instead of the female victim (Paula Jones) ; as a result, N.O.W. was completely and totally neutralized by abandoning women'd right over supporting a fellow socialist. Hillary will be known in history for setting the women's right movement back 50 years.
2007-08-17 14:17:02
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah I'm sure Hillary will be a great President when she's suffering from pms. She has never done anything alone otherwise she would have left Bill after he made her look like an idiot in front of the whole world. The truth is that she needed him as much as he needed her at the time. Can you imagine old Bill entertaining the wives of the Prime Ministers and such that come to visit? I think I'd rather stay home if I were them. To answer the question she'd only be known as a first lady; not a *****. Life's a *****-don't vote for one.
2007-08-10 15:29:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by bfldmom3 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
She was always like a hanger on. She once believed that when Bill was elected, so was she.
Now when Bill was busted for lying and getting a knobber, she stood by her man like a prostitute waiting for "her turn". She has always used Bill like a prostitute uses a john, to make some scratch. She uses Bill to raise money and get on the tube.
Worst of all, she lacks any real skills other than lying and pandering (more of the prostitute habits) to the crowd she's in front of.
She's the worst choice for Americans, my dog would make a better President.
2007-08-12 07:04:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by USA 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hillary caused a fuss right after Bill Clinton was elected by taking on a 'unofficial' role in his government and proposing that the US consider national health care.
There was so much outcry against a mere 'spouse' taking on a leadership role that she had to drop it and start giving interviews about cookie recipes.
So yes, she would still be well known, for her views on government.
2007-08-10 15:09:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by oohhbother 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hillary follows orders period.
If she is to become President and bring about Socialism for Rockefeller and her Communist husband she will do as she's told.
Being married or not has nothing to do with the real agenda that's at stake.
Did you know that Bill Clinton is related to Rockefeller?
And Rockefeller wants total and complete control over the United States?
It all ties in together,the media,the dirty politics,the special interest groups etc.
Hillary is only a pawn being used to achieve New World Order and complete control over the people.
She will only divorce Bill if she's told to do so but unless that happens she isn't going anywhere.
2007-08-10 15:44:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
You know, love is strange that way. When you love someone, you forgive them, perhaps several times, hoping that they will change. Sometimes they do, as they mature and grow in stature.
Neither you nor I know the loneliness of being the person at the top of the heap. Bill Clinton is a man who sleeps little, who stays up into the night working, who is driven by his intelligence and his ambitions. Powerful men, throughout history, seem to have had inflated libidos. He is not the only politician that has strayed, nor will he be the last. We can look forward to a political field day with Guiliano.
Clinton did not deserve the exposure of his private life to the public, nor do you or anyone else. It was purely political and nasty politics, at that.
Yet it seems to have lodged into the minds of some individuals and they dwell on it, as though they are titillated by the humiliation of another human. It is Hillary's business just why she stays with her husband. Those who wonder about it should tend their own private lives and leave that of others alone. I fail to see what a person's private lovelife has to do with the ability to run a country.
2007-08-10 15:18:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Me, Too 6
·
0⤊
3⤋
Hillary Clinton is famous simply because she has remained married to Bill Clinton and she was First Lady while he was President of the United States. President Clinton's numerous extramarital affairs have nothing to do with Hillary Clinton's fame.
2007-08-10 15:12:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by midjrsy 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Of course, she's a force of nature. Personally I think she is despicable and will sell us all out to the highest bidder. That doesn't change the fact that it wAS MORE LIKELY she prpopping up the 1rst Clinton White House than ole Bubba Himself...Mary
2007-08-16 13:11:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by mary57whalen 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
to respond to your question, No. Do you bear in mind some years in the past whilst that guy named Dean ran for president. He replaced into the front runner of the Democratic occasion for extremely almost a year. He lost the 1st well-known and honestly everyone theory that it replaced right into a fluke. Then he lost the 2nd and third, and so on. The media had him picked using fact the subsequent president using fact of his polls, yet they did no longer pan out interior the balloting sales area. the element is, do no longer problem relating to the polls from the media, problem relating to the balloting consequences.
2016-10-14 22:27:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary is an excellent candidate for the Presidency
and would make an excellent President. I really think that YOU are one of those freakin' conservative A$$holes that would rather have that dunce GW and the ever ignorant Cheney drag us into more wars. Get your head out of your butt and take a good look at the past six years and how this bunch has stuck it to the working families.
2007-08-10 15:16:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by supressdesires 4
·
2⤊
3⤋