English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3,701 K's and 3.31 ERA. I'm only 34, so I really don't remember much of his career, as his glory days were in the 70's and 80's, but 287 wins seems a lot to not be in the Hall of Fame. Will he ever get in?

http://www.baseball-reference.com/b/blylebe01.shtml

2007-08-10 13:43:18 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Baseball

6 answers

Blyleven is being punished because he pitched for mediocre teams so often.

Look beyond his wins...

4,970 innings pitched, 13th overall
60 career shutouts, 9th overall
3,701 strikeouts, 5th overall
1,830 career earned runs allowed, 10th overall
4,632 career hits allowed, 14th


Those are ALL very important numbers... top 15 in those five career numbers should be enough to get "The Dutchman" elected to the Hall-of-Fame. The honor is LONG overdue!

2007-08-10 14:18:05 · answer #1 · answered by baseballfan 4 · 2 0

specific to the two. besides to what honestly everyone else has mentioned approximately Bert Blyleven, he's 5th on the all-time strike out checklist. i'm no longer a great 'sturdiness' logician, different than on occasion, yet whether you are able to desire to argue that 3,000 SOs are not a magic quantity, Walter Johnson's total nevertheless is. Blyleven blew that away. Tommy John, too, and on a similar time as 25 years is sufficient to evaluate a participant for, John additionally lost a million a million/2 years to the surgical treatment that now bears his call. He could easily have had the magic 3 hundred wins. That shown fact that his replaced into the surgical treatment that has saved extremely some different careers, and the very shown fact that it bears his call, and the very shown fact that rather 250 wins quite ought to be the parent to a minimum of evaluate a guy, John is qualified in each and every way. yet, in case you mandatory extra, he replaced into in his time extremely a fixture interior the submit season, which he does no longer have been in if he hadn't been powerful to the communities he replaced into on.

2016-10-14 22:17:20 · answer #2 · answered by simpkins 4 · 0 0

Blyleven is something of the opposite of Jim Rice. He was a very good pitcher for a long time, but he never was one of those awesome guys that dominated a league. Don Sutton was like that. I never looked at him during his career and said, "Sure Hall of Famer." But when he got done playing and his career was reviewed, the numbers do add up.

My guess is that Blyleven will enter the Hall eventually.

2007-08-10 15:02:48 · answer #3 · answered by wdx2bb 7 · 0 0

There are very few true injustices across baseball history of more-than-worthy players denied the Hall (without a specific, non-playing reason, like Rose). Blyleven is one of the top two names on the short list of such luminaries.

2007-08-10 14:37:19 · answer #4 · answered by Chipmaker Authentic 7 · 0 0

I think it is still possible. They now have to lower their "standards" a little bit for pitchers. The days of pitchers getting 300 wins are over. That was usually the standard for pitchers, get 300 wins and get in. His 3701 K's should have gotten him in already, but Nolan Ryan took even that standard away. I have a feeling though that he probably will not get in from the writers. It will probably take the Veterans Committee to get him in.

2007-08-10 13:49:48 · answer #5 · answered by kepjr100 7 · 0 0

I think that Bert will eventually make the Hall of Fame, although he should already be in.

2007-08-10 19:05:44 · answer #6 · answered by voteforwalker 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers