English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When Will Stuff Come Out on Obama?




RUSH: Janet in... Godley, Illinois?

CALLER: (Laughs)

RUSH: Is that really Godley, Illinois?

CALLER: Yes, it is.

RUSH: Well, Janet, welcome to the program.

CALLER: Thank you. I am so excited about talking to you, and I'm so nervous. I wanted to talk about a different aspect of Obama's candidacy. No one has touched on his very far left stance on social issues such as abortion, and there was an incident here in Illinois about seven years ago, at Christ Hospital -- a suburban hospital to Chicago -- where babies who were born alive after a botched abortion, were left to die in linen closets and a nurse exposed it, and she was of course fired, and there were demonstrations, and it led the Illinois legislature to formulate the Infants Born Alive Act, which stated that infants who were born alive as the result of a botched abortion, could not be left to die, and Barack Obama voted against it.

RUSH: May I stop you right there?

CALLER: Yes.

RUSH: Don't lose your train of thought.

CALLER: Okay.

RUSH: What does it say about the state of Illinois and the country in general, when such a law is required?

CALLER: Yes, I know. It is very sad.

RUSH: A baby born alive in a botched abortion can't be killed!

CALLER: Right.

RUSH: (Gags.)

CALLER: I know. It's pretty sick.

RUSH: Okay, what did Obama do?

CALLER: He voted against that act. He went on rerecord and voted against a law to protect those children.

RUSH: Well, I’m sure he had a reason! What was it?

CALLER: You know, I could not for the life of me tell you. I'm sure it was to protect the right of the woman to choose.

RUSH: It is that, but I'll tell you what it is? There is something corrupting about the Democrat Party. Do you know that both Bill Clinton and Al Gore were pro-liers?

CALLER: No, I did not know that.

RUSH: Yeah, they were. When you seek national office in the Democrat Party, one of the first things you have to do is cash in that chip, and you have to pay homage to the sacrament of the religion of that party which is abortion. You don’t' stand a prayer of getting the nomination in the Democrat Party if you do anything that would make any abortion harder to accomplish or to get done. So that's Obama. It's clear to me he had national aspirations at the time, then he did not want to do anything that would anger the NAGs and the militant feminists, and the general leftists in the party.

CALLER: Right. I think that should be publicly known during this campaign, how far, far left he is.

RUSH: This stuff will all come out. I'm going to tell you something. Aside from the most-informed audience in media, which is you and everybody else listening to this program, most people really start paying attention to this stuff after Thanksgiving, when the primaries start.

CALLER: Mmm-hmm.

RUSH: I'll give you a great example. At this time in 2004 on the Democrat side, who was all the hullabaloo about?

CALLER: Ummmm, was it John Kerry?

RUSH: No, it was Howard Dean.

CALLER: Okay.

RUSH: It was Howard Dean. He was raising all this money, and why he was raising all this money, and why he's collecting more money than anybody ever knew existed out on the Internet! He's setting new examples for everybody to follow! Howard Dean, everywhere he went, was the frontrunner. And then they had this little thing called the Hawkeye Cauci, and they actually started voting, and he was nowhere! He was nowhere. John Kerry comes out of there as the guy who wins it, and that's what launched Kerry, because they said, "Wooo! He's the guy! Look at the surprise," because everybody had assumed, because the wonks and the pundits who paid attention to this stuff and believed all the polls that are out there. Howard Dean was in exactly the same place as Hillary Clinton is.

CALLER: Mmm-hmm.

RUSH: Maybe not in fundraising, maybe not as much money, but "Presumptive nominee, only a matter of time," but most people didn't start paying attention to Howard Dean and see how weird he was until late in the year, late in November and early December. So this stuff about Obama... (sigh) I don't know that Democrats are going to bring it out about him. If he happens to get the nomination or if he's chosen to be veep, you wait. This stuff will all come out. It's just waiting, but you don't want to bring it out now. People forget about it. The timing of this kind of stuff is crucial.

2007-08-10 12:13:39 · 12 answers · asked by mission_viejo_california 2 in Politics & Government Politics

12 answers

Why is it that rightwingers can only win arguments by lying, smearing, and cheating?

You have no credible references or links to any of these accusations, because they are all LIES.

2007-08-10 12:18:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7 8

Obama voted against the Infants Born Alive Protection Act.

2007-08-10 12:32:44 · answer #2 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 4 2

The BS factor is heavy in almost every event of any candidate. But Mitt Romney is in some special category of his own. I had trouble believing that anybody in that room could believe anything he said. Tanned, wonderfully dressed, tall, and enviably fit for a 60 year old, Mitt comes off as too slick by one-half. Someone once said he ought to learn to stammer a bit more, in the posed manner of, say, a Bill Clinton.

Not Mitt. He doesn't botch a word as he delivers one rehearsed graph after another. I'll save you the rhetoric and cut to his main point: "STRENGTH." A Strong Military. A Strong Economy. Strong Families. A Strong America. Strong. Strong. Strong.

Got the point?

But the shamelessness factor was sort of out of control. He's the man to bring "change" to Washington, but his stump speech omits any single policy matter on which he differs from Bush. He asks us to thank Bush for keeping us safe for the last six years and goes out of his way to praise the rough treatment of detainees at Gitmo. No cheers for those ideas, not even from the loyal Republicans in the room.

2007-08-10 12:17:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

oh wow... a citeless call on the Limbaugh show...

say no more... it has to be the truth...

why is it when ever I look into something that Rush is talking about... there's always A LOT MORE TO IT than what he's saying? in fact, it happened so much... I don't even bother giving any validity to anything he says anymore...

HE'S almost exactly like Michael Moore in style... just a different medium... they realized a long time ago that people don't care about the whole truth as long as the half truth agrees with their ideas... and they made careers on it...

2007-08-10 12:22:14 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 3

I observed that video. i've got by no ability seen something like it ever. different than in video clips or previous historic previous clips exhibiting the Hitler little ones making a music compliment to Adolph. Or in North Korea, making a music "adoring" sonnets to the "costly chief". it is extraordinary. it is creepy. it is purely incorrect on assorted ranges.

2016-10-02 01:50:43 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No surprise, Obama is a politician well versed in the democrat process. Lie cheat and steal to get elected, then do as you please once in office, just like the bunch elected in 2006!

2007-08-12 03:43:55 · answer #6 · answered by stupidcaucasian 6 · 2 0

That is true. It was called the Born Alive Bill.
Even if the baby is born alive, Obama has voted against keeping the baby alive. He wants the hospital to have authority to kill it. DEAD.

His evil reasoning:
"It would essentially bar abortions because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this was a child then this would be an anti-abortion statute," Obama said

Watch all the liberals try to attack the messenger and not respond to the truth. Why? because the truth hurts

2007-08-10 12:19:06 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3 6

I must say you have broken out a big old shovel for mud slinging. I'm impressed.

BTW: Just to let you know, Rush is commentary and should not be used to replace actually getting news for yourself. No matter how accurate he says he is, he's still commentary.

2007-08-10 12:52:28 · answer #8 · answered by Deep Thought 5 · 1 2

Thank you. You are right about Obama voting against it. He is nothing but a smooth talking zero.

2007-08-10 12:47:36 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 6 2

And if you can't trust Janet in Godley, Illinois, who can you trust?

Show me the legislation, and his reasoning. Otherwise, I'm pretty sure Obama is still the idealist--human, flawed, but an idealist--I believe him to be.

2007-08-10 12:19:05 · answer #10 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 6 6

http://www.prolifeismurder.com

2007-08-12 04:43:29 · answer #11 · answered by Give me Liberty 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers