Do you think Al Gore is the "dark horse" in this election? Either for the democrats alone or for the final race? If not, which candidate votes the closest to you on the issues and please state your issues.
2007-08-10 11:18:09 · 25 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
No. I respect Al Gore and the work he has done to wake up the world on the issue of global warming, but in 2000 Mr. Gore said that he believed freedom of religion does not mean freedom from religion. His wife is part of the evangelical movement. We do not need any more of this right wing religion pressed upon the nation. I support Kuchinich. I agree with his stance on Iran, Nafta, health care and the environment. There is not another candidate that more closely represents the direction that this country moves in.
2007-08-10 17:42:24 · answer #1 · answered by OldBadgerWoman 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I could never vote for Al Gore. Al uses scare tactics to promote his own business interests. The only reason he talks up global warming is because he owns a company that could be worth 100's of millions if he can persuade everyone that buying and selling carbon credits is a good thing. Meanwhile he jets around the world, heats immense homes, drives ginormous SUV's and more. He uses more hydrocarbons than 99.999% of all the people in the world.
Now ask yourself, "what has he accomplished"? Did he reduce crime? Did he invent something? Did he provide a great service or product? All I ever hear from Al Gore is hate and discontent.
Al Gore is the horse's patuti not the dark horse.
The issues I most care about.....winning in Iraq, a robust economy, low taxes, less government, immigration reform and enforcement, reducing crime, Supreme Court Justices who follow the Constitution (not rewrite it), put me sqaure with the likes of Rudy Giulliani, Mitt Romney, or Fred Thompson.
open markets (including healthcare). You know, people who have actually accomplished something. It's not what you say you will do, it's what you actually do that counts.
2007-08-10 11:42:39 · answer #2 · answered by Partisanshipsux 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
i've got faith his thinking is extra alongside the lines of invoice Clinton... merely as invoice desires to be the ambassador to the international whilst Hillary gets elected, i think of Al believes that with each and every of the drum beating occurring that the ambience is approximately to be the social mechanism to point us with the international, a great redistribution of our materials (funds) which will put in line with different third international international places... Russia, China, globalism would be each and every of the craze, and Al sees him using fact the only genuine man or woman to supervise the completed factor... so it will be a great ego contest between the two Clintons and Gore to share the spotlight.
2016-10-14 21:54:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's not going to work that way this time. I wish Al Gore would run, but he won't. I wish Obama were more experienced, but he isn't. I wish I like Edwards more than I like his wife, but I don't. I wish I trusted Hillary more than I do. I wish Kucinich had been a good administrator previously. I wish Guiliani was really a hero. I wish McCain would just shut up.
In the end I'll cast my votes by process of elimination - based on my issues and my observations about the authenticity and reliability of the candidates available. PERIOD. I will never vote for a neo-con or an actor.
2007-08-10 11:30:59 · answer #4 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
he wouldnt win even if he got the majority of votes.
simply because of this. our government is backed almost 70 % by oil company's.
but honesly i will vote for literally almost any non republican.
and all you against abortion and freedom of religion need to realise that people have a right to do what they want to do. and u have no right to say they cant.
2007-08-12 05:28:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah, Al Gore has finally found his true destiny...to save the planet!
2007-08-10 11:42:48 · answer #6 · answered by mstrywmn 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
al entered in 2000
i did not vote for him
i watched the green party pull 3 per cent from his flank
al should join my party
egalitarian utilitarian
and run
the current "brown parties" have no future
it is not impossible that hillary could save us
but she will have to be a green socialist
regardless green socialism is the only possible sustainable answer
these wars have decimated asia and taken us back hundreds of years. there has to be checks on industrialism.
right here in california they are still killing trees
the brown party supposed liberals of the city of santa cruz just stripped all the trees and bushes off the local library
the university of california at santa cruz tree killers KILL HUGE REDWOODS
some republican said "I AM NOT A TREE HUGGER". it's because he hasnt thought it through. let us all go out and hug a tree before there are none
2007-08-10 11:30:04 · answer #7 · answered by thomasdavidhalbrook@yahoo.com 2 · 1⤊ 4⤋
oh I toyed with this one in 2000... on one hand you'd have a President who cared about the environment. On another you'd have the PMRC in as First Lady...
It really depends on my other top-runners who I had previously chosen. I like Ron Paul right now because of his ideas on what the government truly needs... and I like Kucinich because of the gay marriage issue.
And I'd have to do some reading up on Gore for future reference too.
I think it'll be a long time until I choose one person over everybody else though.
How soon until the NH primaries? I have less time than most to study up!
2007-08-10 11:26:24 · answer #8 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I would love to see him enter the election as an independent and steal votes from the Democratic front runners.
2007-08-10 11:27:34 · answer #9 · answered by JamesW 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I would NEVER vote for algore, or any Democrat. I disagree with higher taxes, socialized healthcare, abortion on demand and civil unions.
2007-08-10 12:38:49 · answer #10 · answered by nowyouknow 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋