English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

24 answers

They are waiting to see if their "friends"(liberals) will be dumb enough to elect a muslim for President, then they can just destroy the country from the inside out.... If their "friends" (liberals) elect hillary, they wont have to do anything, but sit back and watch her destroy it for them....

2007-08-10 11:04:47 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 6

It was a long time between attacks the last time too. Don't you remember the tutelage we all got about Al Queda after 9/11? They take an average of 6 to 7 years to plan their large scale attacks. It sure isn't because Bush has done such a bang up job of securing our borders and ports. We're the "Great Satan," no suicide bombers for us, when they hit us they like it to be spectacular. I hope and pray we do not suffer another attack on our soil, but attributing the lack of it the last six years to the Bush Administration is ludicrous.

2007-08-10 12:09:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

The terrorist plots have in many cases been fakes designed to permit Bush to fearmonger (including citadel Dix and JFK, which they close up approximately whilst they found out that individuals weren't believing it). it quite is real that we are a lot extra probably to be attacked by terrorists now, yet it quite is by using the fact we escalated our assaults against them. as quickly as we bypass around overthrowing governments interior the middle East for a million/2 a century or extra, we ought to continuously no longer be shocked whilst some small team hijacks some airplanes and crashes them into a number of our homes. we ought to provide up being an imperialistic ability. Isolationism is the appropriate foreign places coverage, as history proves (the Isolationists back interior the 50s antagonistic the chilly conflict using fact Communism replaced into inherently incorrect and could ultimately fall). international conflict II did no longer turn up as a consequence of Isolationism the two. We provoked Pearl Harbor by applying financial conflict (sanctions) against the eastern. on a similar time because it would not excuse the assaults against us merely using fact they have been retaliations to our foreign places coverage, it additionally would not excuse us for having this variety of defective foreign places coverage. George Washington replaced into precise approximately what we ought to continuously do with different international places.

2016-10-14 21:50:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

How many terrorist attacks did we have BEFORE 9/11 in the US? Only once... in 1993 at the WTC. Obviously Al Quaeda is not powerful enough to hit us multiple times in a year or even in a decade.

I am very tired of this question... People who ask this make it sound like the United States territory was constantly attacked before 9/11. Al Quaeda has very limited resources to make attacks... They can not and have not been able to attack us at will. Don't buy into the hysteria of this administration pretending that they have unlimited money and supplies and men to attack our shores. They just don't have the resources.

This also does not mean that they won't try again... but it took them nearly 10 years to make a second attempt. Let me stress again... 10 years people.

2007-08-10 10:56:23 · answer #4 · answered by cattledog 7 · 3 4

You think they care. So far they spend around one hundred thousand dollars, and lost maybe a dozen men.
We've spent billions and lost at least 2,500 in the Trade Center and 3,600 in the misguided war in Iraq. Bin Ladin is still breathing, and Al Qaida is still recruiting. I think they take the long view and will attack again when the new president, whomever it is take office. They like to show a new government that their country is still vulnerable, as they did in England just recently.

2007-08-10 10:58:03 · answer #5 · answered by justa 7 · 4 0

What for?

I'm not going to argue about who did it. I'm just stating the fact that no matter who did it, it doesn't make sense to strike again.
If the terrorist did it, they won. The government of the USA is oppressing its own citizens, taking all their constitutional rights one by one in order to "secure" them. With no opposition, no way to express disagreement, no way to challenge the policies, no guns to fight back. Whoever did it to make your life worse and ruin your way of life has done a wonderful job.
And if the government did it, well, go back one paragraph and read again.

2007-08-10 11:00:13 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

well because first of all , terrorists didnt strike in the US. The Bush administration did, in a ploy to pass the US Patriot ACT . Which they did, allowing them to do all sorts of ****** up things to the american people, and people abroad. also they needed a rallying point for America so that they could prosecute an Illegal war in afghanistan and Iraq. What is sad is that history will prove me right in the end, when it all comes out after Bush and his Puppeteers(cause Bush is a moron and could never think up something this complicate) are all dead.

2007-08-10 11:06:18 · answer #7 · answered by Josh W 3 · 2 2

Why were there no major terrorist attacks in the US between the first and second WTC attacks? Because nobody knows when terrorists will strike, except the terrorists themselves. Clearly you can't point at any reason, or you'd have told us.

2007-08-10 10:52:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6 3

I'm sure in due time there will be another attack in the mean time the Fear Factor still working is it not ?



"Most definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear or "terror"

2007-08-10 10:57:27 · answer #9 · answered by EviL 6 · 3 0

Yeah, because terrorist attacks on US troops don't count...?

2007-08-10 10:56:37 · answer #10 · answered by stelle d. 3 · 5 0

Because the CIA is pulling back for the time being to make the war on terror look like it is working.

9/11 was an inside job to make the sheeple accept less freedom.

Fake war on terror = destroying the Constitution!!

2007-08-10 10:54:15 · answer #11 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 4 4

fedest.com, questions and answers