English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Does the processor Intel Celeron with 3.4 GHz is better than Core 2 Extreme with 2.93 GHz?
Thanks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-08-10 09:02:16 · 9 answers · asked by darko m 1 in Computers & Internet Hardware Other - Hardware

9 answers

no its not .. the architecture isnt anywhere near as good ..

2007-08-10 09:04:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You could link directly to Dell's site to let a buyer see the exact specs of what they are getting (link below). Here are the pertinent details to list though: Intel® Celeron® M 360 Processor (1.40GHz, 1MB Cache, 400 MHz) 256MB shared DDR SDRAM 14.1” WXGA TFT Display with 1280 x 800 resolution Integrated Intel® Media Accelerator 900 Graphics 40GB Ultra ATA hard drive Combo Drive: 24x/10x/24x CD-RW and 8x DVD-ROM New ones seem to run just under $300 so I'd estimate about $50-$120 for yours as long as the battery is holding a charge for a decent period of time. The main feature of value is MS Office 2003 (which must be a retail licensed copy since the laptop was sold with WordPerfect). The laptop is definitely older and underpowered for most current applications. There are new models that are sold for a little more and easily out perform yours.

2016-05-19 01:03:20 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

The processor Intel Core 2 Extreme is much better tha the celeron. His core technology is more better than the one on the celeron type. The speed is not the key in this case. Look on the prices on these processors and you'll findout who is better. Also you have many comparations on internet where you can find more about these processors.

2007-08-10 09:09:24 · answer #3 · answered by KolE 2 · 0 0

nope....
even though the celeron GHz is a tad bit higher, celeron in itself is just a lower grade chip.
if it's an intel Core 2 DUO Extreme, then that'd just be sic....
but you're saying a core 2 extreme at 2.93, yes, i would say that is way better than the celeron.

2007-08-10 09:05:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

of course no my friend coz celeron is about 512 kb but the core duo could be 2 or 4 or 8 mb cache memory

2007-08-10 09:06:44 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

No.

The clock speed of the celeron is meaningless.

The core2 extreme is a dual-core processor - and will smoke the celeron.

(Though even a 2.8G P4 will smoke that celeron... they are junk).

2007-08-10 09:07:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no not by a long shot. the celeron has very little cache and a very slow fsb. the c2d extreme is so much better then it u cant even compare the,

2007-08-10 09:09:11 · answer #7 · answered by Jake 7 · 0 0

CPU's... I can't make head or tail of them. "Architecture" "dual core" "hyper threading".. I miss the old days when it was Pentium I, Pentium II or Pentium III.

2007-08-10 09:08:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

One processor vs 2.........

I would go with the Duo.

2007-08-10 09:07:15 · answer #9 · answered by Jeremie I 4 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers