Where is it better to live for single people?
2007-08-10 09:02:15 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Travel ➔ United States ➔ Las Vegas
For singles Las Vegas is more active.
2007-08-10 12:25:08 · answer #1 · answered by Bruna 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither is great - too much sprawl, too much distance - but it's probably Phoenix. Las Vegas is more of a retiree location, the strip atttracts the wrong kind of singles, and there's not as much business to attract young business types. Phoenix, though it doesn't have a big downtown, at least has Scottsdale, and has more of a young population. I think better options would include Chicago, Denver, etc. but if you're choosing between those two, I'd say Phoenix.
2007-08-10 09:16:06 · answer #2 · answered by Marc W 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I've lived in Las Vegas - for 9 years- it's great for awhile, but then... Take Phoenix- it's got to be a more "normal" place to live
2007-08-10 16:22:49 · answer #3 · answered by nanny411 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Las Vegas without a shadow of a doubt.
2007-08-11 11:51:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would not want to be in either place during the summer, but at least there's more to do in Vegas than watch the lizards crawling on the walls.
2007-08-10 10:46:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
lass vegas lots of single persons.
can i have a ba
2007-08-10 10:22:11 · answer #6 · answered by Michael M 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
phx, las vegas loses it's luster after a while.
2007-08-10 11:20:56 · answer #7 · answered by burnttoast97 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋