http://thinkprogress.org/2007/08/09/matthews-bush-monologue/
The neo-Cons sure get a lot of airtime for a group that doesn't exist.
Hey, look. Is that Bill Kristol over there hiding in the corner?
2007-08-10 08:59:55 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
eelfins, when you say "labels", do you mean labels like "liberal"?
2007-08-10 09:11:17 · update #1
Bit of sarcasm, here, folks. Bill Kristol?
Editor of Weekly Standard?
Grand Poo-Bah at PNAC?
2007-08-10 09:12:52 · update #2
The "label" Neo-Conservative is applied pretty much only to the Republicans. However if you listen to and watch the leading Democrats these days there is no difference between them and Wee Willy Kristol. They are all NEO-FASCISTS. THAT is a term we all should start applying to all these lying bastards (and bitches in the case of Hitlery and Pelosi). With "leaders" like this who needs imaginary Islamic terrorist enemies?
2007-08-10 11:36:55 · answer #1 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, then call them fascists. Both terms work for me and they do exist. They are tearing the fabric of the Republican party, relegating them to has been! You know one when you hear one!
I liked "(Bush) When he talked about the fact that we can support emerging democracies in the Middle East, and that’s the only way we can prevent future 9/11’s, you’re getting to the heart of why this administration is fighting that war in Iraq."
That proves Bush is numb! He is going to turn a religious based Middle East into a democracy (which doesn't exist anywhere in the world)?
Iraq was a Constitutional Republic before we (the CIA) put Saddam into power!
Iran had an elected government until it was overthrown by terrorist attacks orchestrated by the CIA so we could put the pro US Oil Shaw of Iran into power! Neither were very democratic, and both were pro US Oil until Saddam gave 3 contracts for oil to France and Russia, sealing his fate!
Sounds like a good sound bite, but it isn't true. We change governments in the world for economic reasons so the rich can maintain there status!
Personally I am tired of American troops dying for corporate profit.
As if Bush believes that BS! If he does, he is crazier than I thought!
2007-08-10 16:15:15 · answer #2 · answered by cantcu 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Im looking at the answers from the Right, as disengaged fro reality as ever, and you may very well have a point.
Its kind of like hate doesnt really exist.Its just envy with jewelry on!
(wink)
2007-08-10 16:28:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
The term "neo-conservative" was coined by the rightwingers who wrote PNAC. They own the term, not the leftwingers.
2007-08-10 16:07:12 · answer #4 · answered by cashmere 3 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Why would true evil present itself.I guess the secret societies that alot of them belong to don't exist either.Please take the blue pill,and get out of the matrix
2007-08-10 16:06:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 1⤋
Labels are a convenient way of enforcing hatred of those who don't believe what you do. Neo means new, so liberals like to accuse others of being new. Their boney fingers are pointed at anyone who is new, especially fetuses.
"Liberal" is what liberals choose to be called, it's not a label.
2007-08-10 16:05:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
Dick Cheney,Karl Rove all of the corporate whores in Congress.. Get it now?
2007-08-10 16:05:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
doesn't exist huh? Why do traditional conservatives such as Pat Buchanan and Ron Paul and William Safire say they do?
2007-08-10 16:03:05 · answer #8 · answered by captain_koyk 5 · 7⤊ 1⤋
It's a little like those libs you people rant about.
A convenient strawman? Perhaps every group needs one.
2007-08-10 16:09:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
neo-conservative = NEW conservatives = not traditional conservatives... you really think it refers to some sort of organization?
2007-08-10 16:07:18 · answer #10 · answered by jsplat 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋