If Clinton Portis goes down, which is likely, then you're toast. Your receivers are pretty average. Your bench is decent, but not to the point of overcoming your team's deficiencies. I personally recommend picking up Betts if he is available, just in case Portis sucks. Getting Chicago's D is nice, and Heap is a good TE. That will help. But not having top running backs in the public leagues is a team killer, even if you do have Manning. A lot of it will come down to Portis' health and whether or not McGahee breaks out or not. If you had one star receiver, I'd say you had a pretty good chance.
That said, everyone comes on here and asks about their team, but there is one problem with that: how good your team is is relative. Without seeing what the other teams look like, it is really impossible to say. If you are in a public, 10-team league I think you are in trouble, although your bench is not too shabby. But if you are in a custom 12+ team league, then you may be in good shape.
2007-08-10 08:38:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mr. Taco 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Qbs-10 out of 10-The Manning Brothers are a good combo of backup and starter.
WRs-7 out of 10-You lost a little in this one, Branch is ok at best, and same goes for Berrian, but Chambers is terrible, over the hill. I would start Devery Henderson, cuz he's got Brees passing to him, and has a lot of upside. Furrey is a question mark, because he is ok, but with Calvin Johnson's arrival, he will be the number 3 WR, which is a shame, but its just how it happens.
RBs-8 out of 10-well, your backs are above average, and are both number 2 backs. Willis is good, but was cold last year, and portis will split with Betts. I would be tempted to put Lynch in place of both of those, depending on the matchup, or if he becomes great like everyone says. But your line is all question mark players that could be good, and have upside, but you need a reliable back to balence it out.
TEs-10 out of 10-Heap is good, and Olsen will probably be good, but with him being a rookie, and having Rex throwing to him, he could be shaky.
K-its a kicker
DEF-10 out of 10-Chicago is the most consistantly producing DEF in the league, always hovering around 1st or 2nd, and Buffalo is ok, but a good backup.
2007-08-10 15:45:51
·
answer #2
·
answered by desrocor 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
both of your starting rbs are not elite...theyre good but not amazing im guessing you took manning in the first round which really screws you over with rbs
and your wrs could really be improved try trading around a little bit
as for def, te you have nothing to worry about
2007-08-10 15:35:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by Max F 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
so u took peyton in the first round...thats a mistake and now you have bad RB's. Everything is good except ur RB's. I would recommend trading for some better ones.
2007-08-10 15:27:20
·
answer #4
·
answered by dgowland11 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
your qb will be doing most of the work. put mike furrey on staring and you may have 2 decent players
2007-08-10 15:26:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
If everyone else jumped off a bridge I'm assuming you would too.
2007-08-10 15:24:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by qwerty 4
·
0⤊
0⤋