ROFLMAO No, they don't have any solutions, it would involve change and they can't handle that. Someone might actually have to give something up.
2007-08-10 08:10:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
3⤋
The health care system as it stands right now is costing us lives. Anyone who is not insured and cannot afford to go to the doctor lives with the fear that a disease will kill them because they have no hope to receive care. Those who oppose socialized medicine need to consider what it would be like to live like that. Those who have the money to get the best treatments don't think about what it would be like if they couldn't afford it. There are arguments for both sides, absolutely, but I would take health care for every single HUMAN BEING before I tossed some of them aside for the sake of saving a few bucks. The health care plans proposed in the 2008 elections use the money from Bush's tax cuts for the wealthy. Now, please tell me why rich people can't give up their tax cuts so everyone will have access to health care. The plans ALLOW you to keep your insurance, but they give others a sense of security that they will be able to live out their life even though they don't have money to pay for it themselves. Society is about give and take. If nobody will give, we are not a democracy. You can't have your money and watch people float to the wayside. This is a democracy, everybody is treated equally. Health care should be considered an equality right under the Constitution of the United States of America.
2016-05-19 00:32:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's worse than what you say - I reply to lots of questions about health care, and there always seems to be one or two answers suggesting some kind of cap on lawsuits combined with a "choice" of private or Federal coverage. They tend to leave in the obscene profits for the insurance and pharmaceutical companies, and to leave themselves out of the new system. It's a proposal all right, but it wouldn't solve the current problems we're facing related to costs and so many people who have no coverage.
2007-08-10 08:37:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Who Else? 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
They do have solutions. Their solution to health care is to let market forces decide how much medical care costs. Their solution to a failing educational system is school vouchers. Their solution to poverty is for people to take low paying minimum wage jobs
2007-08-10 08:14:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by xg6 7
·
5⤊
1⤋
Cons never have a direct answer to a question. They divert or mislead, call you names, question your rights or bring up another subject. Either they are hiding something, don't want you to know or have a hidden agenda. This particular administration has had a hidden agenda, which is now coming to the surface. I am just so tired of the BS!
2007-08-10 08:17:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
There is no solution. Have you ever know the government to fix anything? Have you ever seen a state road crew work, 10 standing, 5 in the equipment, 1 in the hole, 2 days later, all workers gone, hole still there if not worse. Health-care can be fixed until you end the law suites
The school systems cant be fixed until, teacher teach, not indoctrinate
Poverty is not increasing, it is a lie, 4 percent unemployed, that's the best in the world. Our poor, have color TVs and Nike shoes, and eat out every night.
2007-08-10 08:15:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
We have a solution. Cap payouts. We also have a solution for Education. Get rid of the union. Poverty is on the increase, so its time to deport illegals and start putting all the welfare recipients in those jobs. We have solutions, it just takes getting off your lazy butts and doing it. When have you ever heard of a democrat with a solution other than tax, spend, and socialism?
2007-08-10 08:14:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
Historically, there has been only one way of making old rich people in power change or take responsibility for their actions, the tried and fool proof method of executing its selfish and greedy politicians.
2007-08-10 08:16:09
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
First they would have to get past the "me, me, me" mentallity. They would have to admit there are other people on this planet besides themselves.
Healthcare? Well, who do you think was behind the "huge FOR profit" HMO's?
Education? No child left behind, but didn't fund it.
2007-08-10 08:17:28
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Because solutions require you to think and do more than parrot talking points.
2007-08-10 08:18:17
·
answer #10
·
answered by Holy Cow! 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
They don't have a solution because for that you need brains and a strategy. Cons rely only on other people doing the work because they don't want to get involved. They're lazy.
2007-08-10 08:10:53
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋