urhavinalaf
2007-08-10 06:20:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by urhavinalafgaj 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
No it's not a word. Laziest is an adjective and thus describes a noun so you could say 'John is the laziest boy in the class.' To ad the prefix 'un' is to attempt to create a word that is opposite to the one that has been used so if someone is 'happy' then the opposite is 'unhappy'. Lazy does not have such a meaning. According to my Chambers dictionary un is described as
Meaning 'not' (in many cases the resultant word is more than a mere negation and has positive force, as in 'unkind' which usually means 'cruel' rather than just 'not kind'. Indicating a reversal of process, removal or deprivation already expressed by the simple word, as in unbare or unloose sometimes added to a present participle with a passive meaning. The meaning is often ambiguous especially in participle adjectives.
There then follows19 pages of examples of words starting with un. Unlaziest is not amongst them.
2007-08-10 14:47:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by quatt47 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's just a way people say it, not a real word
It's like some people say unlazify, but it's not a word.
2007-08-10 13:05:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lone Wolf 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
No,because there is no application that it can be used with.Try attaching it to something in the real world and it does not work.
It is a self-contradiction,an oxy-moron.To be unlaziest would mean to be the busiest.
It is worse than useless because if you use it,you will look like an idiot.
2007-08-10 13:03:50
·
answer #4
·
answered by Den 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
everyone who has answered seems to know what it means therefore it must be a word, so congratulations, you have invented a new word! The joys of the English language!
2007-08-10 19:03:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by JANE W 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No take the un off laziest is a word.
2007-08-10 13:20:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ollie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no this is not a real word the correct term is not the laziest!
2007-08-10 17:49:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
'Unlaziest' is not a word listed in dictionaries. Such a word is not necessary because there are more suitable alternatives, such most active and busiest.
2007-08-10 13:01:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nope!! It is a concoction or better yet a combination of words.
It's also meaningless
2007-08-10 13:03:19
·
answer #9
·
answered by wireczar 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No - especially with having an 'est' on the end!!
2007-08-10 14:06:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by jonoxk 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
no.
the correct word would be something like active
2007-08-10 13:01:43
·
answer #11
·
answered by iluvshusukefuji! 3
·
1⤊
0⤋