English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-10 04:40:47 · 19 answers · asked by livinhapi 6 in Politics & Government Elections

19 answers

It makes me laugh that people think that Bush is so mean and a jerk and all because when Rudy wins they're gonna pray day and night they would have Bush back. Rudy is a mean, nasty, son of a *B* that will make Bush look like a kitten.

2007-08-10 04:43:53 · answer #1 · answered by TJ815 4 · 2 2

Who do I want to send my son to sleep away camp with John Wayne Gacey or Jeffery Dahmer? Neither choice is really an option in this case either. Rudy is the lesser of two evils but not by much.

2007-08-10 15:35:48 · answer #2 · answered by krupsk 5 · 0 1

Rudy would be great and bad at the same time. It depends on the issue.
Hillary has no place running for president. She is a disgrace to what is truly right, correct and proper.

2007-08-10 13:48:23 · answer #3 · answered by Pro-American 3 · 2 2

???? what do you mean after dubya?? don't you know that "dubya" Jordan, and a few others from the middle east, are already partly sponsoring hillary's campaign, didn't you know that they buy favors in advance, regardless of their political persuasion. It's called POLITICS.

2007-08-10 11:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by ~Celtic~Saltire~ 5 · 0 1

Sen. Hillary Clinton, no doubt. I don't really want a guy in office whose private life reads like a cheap novel. Or a guy who has clear ties to the mob. Or a guy who can't even get the support of the first responders from 9/11 even though he uses 9/11 like his own personal resume. Or a guy who has alienated his own children to the point where they won't even stand on a stage next to him while he's running for the highest office in our country. I'll take Sen. Clinton and her clear headed intelligence and qualifications over that any day.

2007-08-10 14:10:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

At least with Rudy, I know that he has the best interests of America as his priority.

I cannot say the same for Hillary.

2007-08-10 11:50:18 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4 2

Of the two, it would be Hillary.

Rudy is fine socially, but he hasn't a lick of foreign policy sense, playing simply me-too with Bush. He hasn't a clue what's up.

Simply being the mayor of a city that was hit does not make one a foreign policy guru.

2007-08-10 14:16:35 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 1 1

hard to find a good leader becouse they are all politicians. politics means compromise .look for somebody doest act ,look and talk like a politicians.we teach our childrens at an early age ..to be honest and to obey golden rules.. try this we will difinitely have plenty of good leaders.

2007-08-10 20:56:24 · answer #8 · answered by pedro 1 · 0 0

Unfortunately, Giuilani stands for many of the same rotten liberal causes as Hillary.

2007-08-10 11:42:48 · answer #9 · answered by Joseph C 4 · 3 2

Definitely not Hillary!

2007-08-10 12:07:23 · answer #10 · answered by jrd 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers