Yes he is. Why? Iraq war of course. Iraq was no threat to us, yet Bush rushed to war! Now we see the disaster. Other reasons why Bush is terrible is his lack scientific thinking. He is a religious fanatic with no scientific intellect. What this means is that science has suffered greatly under Bush with cuts in funds for scientific research. Medical research has been cut meaning more deaths from diseases under Bush.
2007-08-10 04:05:40 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
If the war mongering Bush is the most dangerous and worse President ever (which I agree with ) ,then the majority of Americans who RE-ELECTED this perpetrator of crimes against humanity knowing full well that this evil Christian fundy decided to wage an ILLEGAL war of choice based upon a pack of filthy LIES that has resulted in the slaughter of over 400,000 innocent Iraqi civilians ,are themselves EVIL .
2007-08-10 04:34:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Boy, you've got a lot of mistakes in your question! Part of it is correct, however. Bush is dangerous - to the enemies of civilization and freedom. He is opposed to junk science, such as the global warming hoax and embryonic stem cell research. Global warming was pretty much blown out of the water the other day when it was revealed that the hottest period in recent history was not 1998, as the leftists had knowingly and falsely claimed, but 1938. Increases and decreases in temperatures are merely natural fluctuations which have been going on since the beginning of the earth. I assume you're talking about medical research being embryonic stem cell research, which in fact has provided no results whatsoever and is carried out by pseudo scientists operating on grants. Grants is the key word here. Adult stem cell research, on the other hand, is carried out by real doctors and has produced favorable treatments for numerous diseases and has saved many lives.
2007-08-10 04:31:48 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Way to answer your own question, dude. They should start Yahoo! Propoganda if that's all you're looking for. In truth, Lyndon Johnson was the most dangerous president. He used the military draft for a far more deadly war that was far less necessary. He also started Medicare and Medicaid which was the start to the socialist medicine principles of dems. He also started up welfare programs by the truckloads. He was the worst president in our history and on the whole Bush has been pretty good.
2007-08-10 04:13:16 · answer #3 · answered by Dan 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Vietnam was no threat to us, but Kennedy incresed troops and LBJ used force in Vietnam. Unline Vietnam where we lost over 50,000, over 6 years, we have lost less than 1,000 a year in Iraq. Which is more dangerous? Cutting scientific research doesn't make someone dangerous. Maybe misinformed, or short sighted, but not dangerous.
2007-08-10 04:11:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps you should finish school and then get in on a forum like this. First, you answered your own question so evidently you aren't interested in debate, you just want to rant. Second, grammar, grammar, grammar... it's hard to take someone who can't master his own language, seriously. Last, "science has suffered"? Really? How exactly? When did he "cut" funds for "scientific" research? All scientific research? Read a newspaper before posting on this forum and illustrating your ignorance for everyone.
2007-08-10 04:16:24 · answer #5 · answered by Scott B 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Its rather obnoxious to ask a supposed question and then tell everyone what you think the answer is. That isn't really what Yahoo Answers is for.
That being said, I have to agree with you about Bush. You forgot to mention his almost constant attacks on our nation's environmental protections and his insidious funneling of our nation's wealth to his friends and supporters. Also, his actions and attitudes have caused the US to be despised by the populations of most of America's allies.
2007-08-10 04:19:24 · answer #6 · answered by Azure Z 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You must be too young to have lived under Jimmy Carter.
Yes, the war needs to end. Get our troops out of Kosovo. There were no WMD's there, and they did not attack us on 9/11. It's time to end Clinton's Viet Nam!
2007-08-10 04:09:02 · answer #7 · answered by Dr Jello 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
well, we tried to stay out of WWII but that is a long history lesson and I don't think will work here. I also drool when I talk fast and can't think coherent thoughts. So I'm with you!
2007-08-10 04:22:16 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He is no different from any other president we have had.He is just arrogant enough to show his true colors
2007-08-10 04:10:25 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes.
2007-08-10 04:08:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋