English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

How come there was no resistance in the fall?

2007-08-10 03:27:02 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

7 answers

HAHAHA, people did you forget 3 buildings fell that day????

What about building 7????

Did a plane hit that?

Why did Larry Silverstein admit to having PULLED the building?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100

2007-08-10 03:54:29 · answer #1 · answered by Red Baron 2 · 0 2

Yes you can easily see the clouds of debris pointing up as the floors fell faster, and the floors falling starting at the ground floor where all the explosions were......Oh wait ... the clouds are pointing down as the big debris is falling faster and the floors are falling sequentially from where they were hit.

That must mean that those "Bombs in the Towers" folk are either Idiots or GOP posers trying to discredit any actual uncomfortable facts having to do with the air defenses and prewarnings that were ignored. Any blacksmith can tell you steel is like butter when hot but far below melting temps.

2007-08-10 10:45:53 · answer #2 · answered by Dragon 4 · 1 0

The strength of the WTC came from its exterior shell. The girders that comprised the external walls of the building provided substantially all of the building's vertical strength.
To keep these girders vertically aligned, horizontal floor trusses connected the horizontal stress and strain of each girder with the surrounding girders, and prevented these girders from snapping their joints and slipping.

On 9/11, the high temperatures of the fire caused excessive strain on the floor trusses and they collapsed. Steel does not need to melt in order to collapse. Temperatures associated with burning jet fuel are sufficiently high to lower the tensile strength to a point of catastrophic failure.

When the internal floor trusses became unable to provide horizontal support for the exterior shell, the girders became misaligned causing girder joints to pop. The girders then slid downwards to the ground in a predictable telescoping fashion. Towers 1 and 2 collapsed quickly because, unlike the implosions of buildings that you watch on TV, they did not have internal support.

2007-08-10 12:40:23 · answer #3 · answered by Dutch 6 · 1 0

They fell at a rate slower than the rate that would be accomplished by a controlled demolition. If you have an open mind and have not simply decided that Bush planned and executed 9/11 read http://www.911myths.com/html/freefall.html It is very interesting and hopefully will open your eye.

I think it is so interesting that some people call Bush an idiot and then claim he orchestrated the largest terrorist attack and cover-up known in history. Pick one.

2007-08-10 10:42:09 · answer #4 · answered by davidmi711 7 · 0 0

both fell in about 10 seconds; MAGIC.

2007-08-10 10:30:05 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

I don't know..but I don't believe that it was a conspiracy

2007-08-10 10:33:49 · answer #6 · answered by John 6 · 1 1

Because they were taken down by explosives.

2007-08-10 10:30:55 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 5

fedest.com, questions and answers