It depends on the person concerned at the time before the suicide and at the time of the suicide.
If someone is terminally ill from a medical condition then they might be quite rational about wanting to commit suicide.
2007-08-10 03:20:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jay 5
·
2⤊
2⤋
what's incorrect if suicide is seen as irrational? We human beings have forgot that "irrational" isn't synonyms with "incorrect". Rational would not ability suitable, irrational does no longer advise incorrect. Its purely the case of logical and not logical. thoughts at the instant are not logical yet they're the fact, they're what we experience. Rational shouldn't exchange right into a manner and the stupid human a lot shouldn't make it yet another style like technology the place they make it limited. The Universe isn't a rational place, purely human beings are rational, and individuals which at the instant are not ruined via society and its training are nonetheless comfortable in irrationality. artwork isn't rational, is there something incorrect with the artwork? What has rationality given us? Its stable in the sphere of technology yet its no longer needed that fact lies in the two of the factors.. those products is all our techniques made cycle and we are working the race.. techniques instructions physique reacts.. and in between we watch.. we are our very own slaves. Suicide is neither rational nor irrational
2016-10-02 01:08:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's entirely situational.
Sure, some lovelorn teenager decides that since that cute brunette in his class isn't falling for him, he might as well end it right now because he'll never meet another girl so perfect. He heads for the railroad and tries to kill himself. Rational, or no?
Okay, how about this, then: a man in his 50's finds out he has advanced cancer, nothing can be done, has only months to live, and it will be an immensely painful death. He travels around places he hasn't seen, says goodbye to his friends, makes sure all his loans and bills and all are taken care of. Then in the quiet of his own home, he blows his head off in what he considers an attempt at dying with some dignity instead of in a hospital bed with a catheter and high morphine IV push.
Rational? No? You decide.
A decision can be rational without being a good idea in itself.
2007-08-10 03:20:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by Mika 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
It depends on the culture. Our Western Culture is basically Kantian. For Kant: the suicide is an act of heteronomy: "an action which is determined by some outside influence, some force other than the freedom given by practical REASON;" such as inclination (heteronomy act) is likely to impel the subject to act otherwise – in such a way that it doesn't match with his free will. Such action is non-moral or IRRATIONAL. The free will comes from the REASON. He says:"you must act such that you expect everyone to act the same way" - you must act within a RATIONAL way. The practical and RATIONAL imperative of this maxim ends up: "we must treat others only as ends, not merely as means." I think that those two maxims - the categorical and the imperative are both IRRATIONAL. Why? Because the human 'reason' (or logic) takes place only in the RATIONAL matter like mathematics, while to treat human beings as means it’s an emotional or an IRRATIONAL matter. Here, the REASON is a vague/confusing idea.
2007-08-10 03:47:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by jbaudlet 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
No, while it can be a decision, and even a well considered and thought out decision, it is still considered a result of mental illness.
For example : A man with a diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenia may feel that he is being chased by purple people eaters. So, he barricade himself in his home for protection. Rational thinking? No, illness.
Same with suicide. It can seem like a good choice, or even the only choice, but really it is a choice made during an altered state of mind.
2007-08-10 03:20:41
·
answer #5
·
answered by lovespring 4
·
0⤊
3⤋
It can never be considered as a rational act
because
a person commits suicide only when he loses hope due to any of the reasons and thus can't think/act rationally. (to lose hope itself is an irrational act)
So far as the suicide from religious point of view is concerned; in my opinion, it is also an irrational belief because what would be happened if all the people in the world start believing this and commit suicide. (never meant to hurt who believe this. Its just a point of view I expressed)
2007-08-10 04:08:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mustansar Dar 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
when someone wants to kill self, it is not considered a rational act. It is considered an act that Mental Health believes the person needs to be protected from self.
2007-08-10 03:13:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by laurel g 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
It could be a very rational act.
If you were dying of cancer, a very painful death, ending one's life early and less painfully might be considered a very rational thing to do.
I'm sure there are other examples in which an early death would be a preferred alternative to whatever else was going to happen.
2007-08-10 03:16:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by jack of all trades 7
·
1⤊
3⤋
To the person that wants to kill himself, it could be rational, he has his reasons for doing so. For those who are not doing so, will probably think is irrational.
Usually, when a person is irrational, he probably has thinking that are different from those are rational.
2007-08-10 03:49:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by charmvinci 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
I wouldn't think so....the people ready for suicide are usually too emotional to be thinking rationally...hence the thought of suicide.
2007-08-10 03:16:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Blue Oyster Kel 7
·
0⤊
2⤋