2007-08-10 03:04:24 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
Why bother then?
They should come with a warning label _
"Send at your own risk"
2007-08-10 03:07:05 · update #1
No no no....
They are "second tier", but why, and how?
They have no money, no apparent support, and sometimes the Media tries to ruin them. With that attitude, they are stuck in their downward spiral.
Send them money, tell your friends to, and soon the support starts. Then the media has to report on them. Voting for the lesser of two evils gets us where we are... an apathetic people, deserve an apathetic government.
Play some patriotic music while reading this post, with ever increasing volume, and a crescendo... right about...
2007-08-10 03:11:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No actually sending money to first tier canidates is.. why? all the first tier canidates have corporate sponsers.. so when elected the elite will have the benefits and you don't.. when you send money to first tier canidates, its basically like your screwing yourself over.. None of the first tier canidates will lower taxes, and look out for the majority interest.. If you want actually want a government for the people, you need to vote for someone who doesn't just look out for the interests of corporations
2007-08-10 10:18:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Even if your candidate doesn't win, the winning ones definitely notice how much support and money the others got. Supporting the candidate that most closely represents your views is the best way to promote your views.
2007-08-10 15:44:21 · answer #3 · answered by Matthew O 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i know everyone says this and i know it's true in reality, but i just feel better supporting the candidate i really support, instead of picking the next-best thing because they have a better chance of being elected.
if everyone wasn't afraid to support the candidate that really stood for what they wanted in office, maybe our frayed two-party system would have a chance at rehabilitation. the only chance for change is if everyone stands up together and says, "we won't support the typical, corrupt, money-guzzling, pandering front-running candidates anymore."
2007-08-10 10:12:40 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes, agree. But indirectly also stimulate the economic as well. The thing is not that bad at all.
2007-08-10 10:11:45 · answer #5 · answered by Dony 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree.
2007-08-10 10:07:46 · answer #6 · answered by bobanalyst 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋