Aggression would be my opposing view. I can express whatever I choose and remain 'repressed'.
2007-08-10 07:11:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by midnite rainbow 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Expression.
2007-08-10 09:19:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dovey 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
A freedom expressed without bounds or limit.
A liberal state of being unattacked in any way.
The condition before the civilians got caught in an oppressive war.
2007-08-10 04:22:50
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would say it depends upon the situation where this is used. To me this word conveys the meaning of compulsarily restricted situation .
If so , I would say that "setting Free" is the opposite
2007-08-10 04:06:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by YD 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
in psychology, they say that depression is a defense mechanism to repression
2007-08-10 11:44:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by blearts 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Exxxpression would be one opposite.
2007-08-10 03:44:23
·
answer #6
·
answered by Booger 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Freedom in Jesus Christ.
This type of freedom makes dualisms like "repression vs. expression" obsolete. Because in Christ it is not, "yes or no," but the answer is always "Yes."
2007-08-10 03:44:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
I would choose freedom or liberation! Personal choice and free speech trump despotism.
2007-08-10 04:48:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by Princess Picalilly 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Expression. But you could also go with anarchy. Or declaration. But then again you could use liberation. Or ...
2007-08-10 03:49:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by gldnsilnc 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
ease of expression at high velocity.
2007-08-10 12:53:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Dr weasel 6
·
0⤊
0⤋