English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I mean to say should they really be there? If they are really that concerned with the lives of young children shouldn't they be out working two jobs saving up enough $$ to go out and adopt some orphans like Brad and Angelina...........rather than spending time picketing Abortion Clinics, and torturing those who certainly must already feel tortured?

2007-08-09 15:19:43 · 10 answers · asked by mchlmybelle 6 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Passionate answerer Slipshade! I like that!

2007-08-10 04:17:21 · update #1

10 answers

Yes... it gets my panties in a twist!

2007-08-09 15:22:56 · answer #1 · answered by Bunny Boiler 6 · 0 0

Abortion is such a passionately debated issue I feel that there will always be people, both male and female, that are against it and for it. There are many religions and groups that are against abortion and encourage their members to actively and aggressively speak out against it. The joy of living in a country with free speech is that there will always be somebody who does not share your opinion, and are not afraid to loudly speak their mind about it.

I’ll not bore you with my opinions of abortion or religion as that is not the question here. The question is about males picketing abortion clinics, and my feelings towards it. In all honesty, I feel all people who picket a clinic are wrong. There are many reasons for an abortion that warrant the practice, and these people should realize this. If a woman medically cannot have a child without causing herself horrific health trauma… is it truly fair to scream that she is a murderer?

However picketers, no matter how misguided or passionate about their feelings, have the right to picket peacefully no matter if they are male, female, or other. As long as you are an American citizen, you have the right to speak your mind. I do not understand why a male, outside of religious fervor would be at such a place, as the child is not coming out of him, but I respect everyone’s right to free speech. That’s what America was built on, and what separates, and sometimes alienates us, from many other nations.

Like it or not, no matter if you are a scumbag and protesting at fallen soldier’s funerals, or an honest Joe on a strike line demanding fair pay and benefits, everyone has the right to speak their mind…no matter the sex, race, or religion or how right or wrong they are.

2007-08-09 19:19:08 · answer #2 · answered by Slipshade 3 · 2 0

I think all the people who picket abortion clinics should be arrested for harassment and stalking. There is such a thing as peaceful demonstration, and if they want to do that, they can do so in front of government buildings, not in front of clinics.

2007-08-09 15:27:40 · answer #3 · answered by manic.fruit 4 · 2 0

on condition that abortion is criminal in a republic that has a reliable majority of Christians, your crack on Christians seems absurd to me. to respond to your question, although, NO. a guy or woman is defined as a individual with cognitive reasoning potential. while pulling existence help from a concepts-ineffective guy or woman, we desire no longer get that guy or woman's permission. in the event that they do no longer look to be concepts-ineffective, although, permission is needed. A human with cognitive reasoning potential is risk-free by using the regulation, and could be risk-free no count how reliant they are upon others. a toddler of three months is reliant upon the mummy. i do no longer comprehend what it somewhat is desire to breast feed, yet i will say that killing a toddler for biting your breasts isn't criminal. i think of this occurs at 20-24 weeks, and extra effective than ninety 5% of abortions happen till now this ingredient, yet a committee ought to be shaped to make certain while fetuses attain cognitive reasoning potential and end abortions after that ingredient, different than to maintain the mothers existence. The save the mummy's existence area hits on the self-protection in regulation. those are all legally desperate. This crap approximately forcing your religious perspectives or pretending that girls human beings have an exact to do despite they desire with their physique is purely stupid claptrap. it somewhat is barely forcing your view upon others. Use good judgment reason and the regulation to make certain this, no longer ideals. BTW for a woman's physique, it somewhat is illegitimate to objective suicide and you'll have your rights quickly taken from you, in case you try. So for sure this "its my physique" argument holds no criminal advantage. Edit: in my opinion, if I have been given a woman pregnant, i'd be keen to preserve that youngster with none help from the mummy. Now whilst baby delivery is hard, I even have yet to take heed to a mom say that youngster delivery became into extra good than elevating the youngster for 18 years. Any mom intend to make that declare? I do, although, renowned that maximum adult males do no longer try this, so making adult males the two waiting to make certain if an abortion happens isn't precise. yet, ignoring the rights of a human with cognitive reasoning potential, is likewise no longer precise.

2016-10-09 21:45:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's very easy to stand up for something that will never happen to you!! Some men will never realize that women's bodies belong to women. Having babies is a life-changing thing, for a woman! Men can walk away, women can't.

Men should be able to speak to the woman in their life about the baby, but the ultimate decision is up to us.

2007-08-09 15:25:21 · answer #5 · answered by cherylincanada 3 · 1 0

You're right-- it is a bit nervy of men to be out there picketing. Perhaps if they spent more time educating their fellow men, and less time judging those women, perhaps there would be less unplanned or unwanted pregnancies...

2007-08-09 15:26:17 · answer #6 · answered by Jelyol 6 · 1 0

i think its rude. i mean, the person getting an abortion might have reasons for doing it. wut if she knew she couldn't provide for the child or something like that. they should adopt orphans and such. then they'll be saving a child thats already alive.

2007-08-09 15:26:24 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Does it irritate me: yes
But thats the beauty of freedom of speech.
I would like to know that i could do the same that something that matters to me.

2007-08-09 15:24:07 · answer #8 · answered by damn bunk 2 · 0 0

yeah, until they can do something about the men who bail out on these women, possibly driving them to the clinic.....
they should hush.... maybe spend their time rounding up the deadbeat dads.....

2007-08-09 15:23:37 · answer #9 · answered by from HJ 7 · 2 0

oh yeah it does

2007-08-11 05:14:14 · answer #10 · answered by Mag 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers