English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Some random remarks in the Yahoo Q & A Forum are seen which are highly critical of her candidature for election to American Presidency which may require factual support to convince the electorate and other serious national / international followers of the elections. Benefit of doubt lies in her favour unless proved beyond doubt that she really does not merit the high esteem in which she is held variously.

2007-08-09 14:40:14 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Elections

American electorate have to get for their country a good president of virtue and to the world a great leader of impeccable integrity.

The answers received are very encouraging and promising. Will it not be advisable that the resumes(CVs) of the different candidates are drawn up on their behalf by the informed followers of each of the candidates and made available to the public to make their choices . The contents could be in terms of the desirable attributes of the individual candidate for presidency. All are requestedto give it a try.

2007-08-10 00:00:57 · update #1

22 answers

Let's think about this CAREFULLY- for a moment; Hillary Clinton has been under the MICROSCOPE of national Public & Media scrutiny, for over 15 YEARS now... -& here she is- within voting distance of becoming our FIRST woman President. Other than how many times she goes to the Bathroom every day, do you REALLY think there's anything ELSE we don't know about her- that could change our minds about sending her back to the Whitehouse??! ...Some people in this Country have NEVER liked her, & they NEVER will. But that's NOT going to stop them from scratching up every worm of criticism they can FIND- to discredit her. SO, we're JUST going to have to put up with THEM- just as THEY- are going to have to live with HER, as their President. :)

2007-08-09 15:09:19 · answer #1 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 2 1

I would rather elect a person with personal integrity and humanity, even should their politics disagree with mine, as opposed to the candidate whose politics match mine, but has neither integrity nor humanity.

I dislike Hillary Clinton because she supports a move towards a government with more socialist programs, and thus more of a tax burden on people like me, who currently use far less than our shares of the money and services the government doles out. I dislike how she is gay-friendly in private, but refuses to be more controversial on the subject during public appearances, and I really dislike how she courts voters through fake southern accents and by trying to be more "feminine" and common than she is.

Altogether, I'll take her over a conservative evangelical bible-thumper, but not much else.

2007-08-09 14:54:00 · answer #2 · answered by manic.fruit 4 · 1 1

Obama may be a plenty greater effective proper decision than Hillary. we would desire to no longer enable the Clintons back in place of work. this may be a great mistake! Hilary Clinton doesn’t have the journey, indoors the army or intelligence sectors of our government to attain a time as at as quickly as as we are battling a conflict oversees and reaching a broader “conflict” on terrorism. normally, this would not be an impediment, and there have been many sturdy Presidents, devoid of severe militia credentials –– her husband being one in each and each of them. in spite of the actuality that, as a manner to rectify the quagmire that Bush has have been given us in, and additionally to redirect the “conflict on Terrorism” greater effective effectively, and much off from this Cowboy/Rambo innovations-set employed with the aid of using Bush and his Henchmen, demands someone of the two militia or strategic competence. Hillary may be sturdy at baking chocolate chip cookies... yet proper now we desire somebody who demonstrates mastery of the two militia techniques and distant places places worldwide kin individuals.

2016-11-11 21:58:15 · answer #3 · answered by gracely 4 · 0 0

Ever see the picture of her posing with a US serviceman? Did you see the way his fingers are crossed? It is a symbol that he did not pose for the picture willingly, he was ordered to do so. Don't believe me, check out Snopes.com, a place that debunks lies on the internet, or at least tries to. Snopes is generally kind to Hillary, trying to put some of her foul mouthed rants into context in one segment. On this photo though, they had to admit, it was absolutely true. Hillary wanted a photo op with a serviceman to show how she is liked by the military, but the serviceman signaled, I am not supporting this.

here's the link

http://www.snopes.com/photos/military/crossed.asp

2007-08-09 15:02:22 · answer #4 · answered by SteveA8 6 · 1 1

Hillary is a politician, senator, and a lawyer. But these do not mean she has had any experience as a LEADER. I challenge anyone to provide us with a list of her leadership history. Leadership is needed in the office of the Presidency....and one who has had experience along this line. Our nation is in deep trouble on many fronts.......and we need a leader who is capable of leading.....one who will not buckle under pressure. I do not believe Hillary fills that bill.

2007-08-10 03:50:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I judge it on the healthcare reform task force she chaired in the early 1990s for her husband. No healthcare workers were on it, lawyers were going to solve the problem. She did the whole thing in secrecy (like Cheney in 2001 with energy). She is too secretive, like Bush. In the middle of 1994, Sen. Minority leader Bob Dole asked President Clinton when they would sit down and compromise. Hillary said no. Her political tin ear ruined healthcare reform for a generation. Now she wants to be Prez, with the inability to know when to talk? I think she will be as bad as Bush in solving our problems.

2007-08-09 14:56:24 · answer #6 · answered by Tom Sh*t 3 · 3 1

Her latest and greatest move has been to exploit the horrible bridge accident in Minneapolis. She has jumped on that bandwagon--within mere days--and is now touting that she'll be "Rebuilding America" (a slogan she's borrowing from Bill and his campaign cronies, who are one in the same).

She will not get the nomination she has been fighting for since her husband was elected President.

2007-08-09 15:17:31 · answer #7 · answered by mummaamanda723 1 · 1 1

The best place to discover what is Fact & Fiction is to go to www.snopes.com It is a website that debunks urban legends as well as a great many other things that have gotten spread or rumored about people. Following is the link to learn more about Hillary Clinton. It will tell you whether something she is claimed to have said is fact or fiction. Have fun & hope this helps.
http://search.atomz.com/search/?sp-q=hillary+clinton&getit=Go&sp-a=00062d45-sp00000000&sp-advanced=1&sp-p=all&sp-w-control=1&sp-w=alike&sp-date-range=-1&sp-x=any&sp-c=100&sp-m=1&sp-s=0

2007-08-09 14:56:35 · answer #8 · answered by Positive-Pixie 4 · 3 0

Nothing has to be poven either way. Voters can vote or any reason that comes to their mind. Proven beyond doubt ? Some don't vote for her because they don't like her hair, or the way she smiles, or because she never wears a dress.

2007-08-09 14:48:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

She has done nothing and is running her her adulator's husband which is nothing to brag of. She moved to NY to run and has not passed anything of value and she flip flops.
Her carrier is no longer than Obama bin laden's.
When asked to provide papers on her dealing with he Rose law firm she lied and said she was making cookies. The list is to long to go on but there is a few.

2007-08-09 15:16:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers