If you look without adding propaganda (that the national news spouts) into the equation you can see what may happen, fairly easy. I can see another attack and the elections will be canceled because marshal law is declared by Bush. Bush will continue to be the President until the NAU is created...at that time there will be a voting, that will only include the elite, to decide who will chair the NAU (a makeshift "President" and be over the working groups of the SPP. (I hope I am not correct, but I was dead on about the US attacking Iraq when I said it in 2000 and I could see Bush doing this also to stay in power)
Bush has already created the laws (by sign in statements added to other laws) which would make the implantation of removal of the people's rights and the completion of the North American Union very easy to finish.
2007-08-09 12:48:14 · 24 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I hope you're wrong but I'm afraid you're right. Bush has told Congress over and over that they can't go out and play until they vote to pass whatever bill he orders to be passed. He is the most arrogant and devious person we have ever had for a president and I wouldn't put anything past him. Are we so sure he's not the 'reincarnation' of Hitler? There are so many similarities that it is spooky.
By what I've been reading on here, most people are hiding their head in the sand hoping it will go away if they don't look.
2007-08-09 16:45:22 · answer #1 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Seems a little extreme. However, if this did happen the only thing that could stop it is the power of the people. May sound silly, but when people come together and cooperate they can accomplish anything. Though it is a little scary that the same people that claim to be proud to be American and say they support the American way, vote for people who have slowly been taking that right away. And when they are confronted with this situation instead of admitting they were wrong about the person they voted for they adjust their true beliefs to justify the action done by the person they voted for. If people are this easy to manipulate maybe your not that far off. Time will tell.
2007-08-09 12:57:33 · answer #2 · answered by spkmyer 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Your speculation is not uncommon -- which is kind of amazing since it is so farfetched. I think what lends it credence is the fact that this administration has learned it can do pretty much anything it wants regardless of law or custom, and it can get away with it. (Some folks say that's what The Smirk is all about: "I can't believe you people are letting me get away with all this stuff!").
Still, cancelling an election would be a severe test of American tolerance. I believe it would probably not go down with a majority of Republicans, either. Despite their differences with Democrats, I don't believe their loyalty to President Bush would make suspension of elections acceptable to them.
I'd say voting fraud -- a rigged election -- is a much more likely scenario.
2007-08-09 13:20:13 · answer #3 · answered by argawarga 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Bush Regime Rules of Acquisition and for Maintaining Power
Rule 001 » Once you take their oil, other natural resources, or cheap labor, you never give them back.
Rule 002 » The best oil deal is the one that brings the most profit.
Rule 003 » Never spend more for oil or land than you have to.
Rule 004 » A politician telling the truth is like an Republican saying I made a mistake. Do neither.
Rule 006 » Never allow truth to stand in the way of making money or obtaining power.
Rule 007 » Keep your mouth always open in order to cover your behind.
Rule 008 » Small wars lead to perpetual war.
Rule 009 » Controlling ballot boxes plus the Supreme Court equals the presidency.
Rule 010 » Power is eternal. Be eternal.
Rule 011 » Even if it's free, you can always confiscate it anyway.
Rule 012 » Anything worth doing is worth doing for maintaining power.
Rule 013 » Anything worth doing is worth doing over and over again.
Rule 014 » Keep your family close, keep your oil closer.
Rule 016 » A treaty is a treaty (until it is no longer useful).
Rule 017 » A treaty is a treat is a treaty - but only between consenting CEOs, countries can screw themselves.
Rule 018 » A Republican without profit is no Republican at all.
Rule 019 » Working class satisfaction is irrelevant.
Rule 020 » Only give money to people you know you can bribe or steal from.
Rule 021 » Never place anything before profit, not even Jesus Christ.
Rule 022 » A wise man can feel war profit in the wind, and the wind always blows.
Rule 024 » Wealth can't buy happiness, but you can sure have fun with the illusion while awaiting Armageddon.
2007-08-09 12:52:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Gee. What forecasting abilities! So, you predicted an invasion of Iraq in 2000? Well, the Congress passed the Iraq Liberation Act (Public Law #105-338) in 1998! The current military operation against Iraq was launched on March 19, 2003. George Walker Bush began his first term in office on January 20, 2001. So, I don't see how Operation Iraqi Freedom was designed to help get him elected.
One other point. you might want to know that President William Jefferson Clinton signed Executive Order #12949 on February 9, 1995. It authorizes warrantless wire taps and physical searches for 72 hours. He signed that several months before the bombing of the Federal office building in Oklahoma City. Didn't hear any of the tin foil hat brigade make a lot of noise about that!
2007-08-09 12:58:15 · answer #5 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Yes it could happen, but I think the people & the courts would undo the action. I doubt the military & the people would back Bush staying in power if he attempted the NAU/SPP.
2007-08-09 12:54:42 · answer #6 · answered by viablerenewables 7 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Dear fed up, what r u fed up about? Man, u sound like this friend of mine that has way to much time on his hands!! The U.S. is not close to a revolution or a civil war or anything else like that.
As far as guessing he would go after Sadam, Hell, I guessed that way before he was elected. you sound young, a little bit of advice. Do not let politics run your life. This government has been in place for over 200 years and its not going to change much for the next 200. Keep your cool and cast your vote, its the American way. Support your candidate and hope for the best.
Pres. Bush may not be the best Pres. we have had but he is still our Pres. like it or not. He has made some bad decisions but making decisions is what they do. Do not be suprised if a democrat like Obama or Clinton get into office and do the same things hes doing right now. In case you havent noticed, there are bad people out their that want to kill us Americans, thats you and me!! This has nothing to do with Bush.
Open your eyes and look around, thats the facts Jack, or should I say fedup, Be an American first!!!!
2007-08-09 13:02:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 5⤋
Well, I'm going to say that the prediction you made in 2000 (US attacking Iraq) was not a hard call...the UN had been whining about Saddam not abiding by the treaty and allowing arms inspectors full access.
Now the NAU is purely "Twilight Zone" material. Man, this site brings em' out of the woodwork!
2007-08-09 12:57:51 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 4⤋
It's nice to see that someone else sees the danger with the SPP, NAU and NAFTA.
2007-08-09 12:58:56 · answer #9 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I really do understand your concerns as there is so much stuff going around and I have mixed emotions with regards to globalization.
I think like many do, that our leaders are 'pre-chosen' to continue the trend. It appears to me that Hillary is that person. Bush will be out in '09.
Does that make sense?
2007-08-09 12:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋