English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He would attack illegal aliens, unpopular, easy target
China, easy target, China does not have a TV channel in the USA, so it is not easy for China to defend itself. (to Dobbs audience).
He attacks government departments, with a general criticism, and not in a way that a defense can be effectively mounted.

He does not attack the greatest government fiasco of the last 20 years, the war in Iraq. If he does, he does it mildly and he promptly brings up one of the generals under CNN contract to give participate in what he is saying.
He looks a frustrated old man, not very smart and not very fair.

2007-08-09 12:03:42 · 11 answers · asked by johnfarber2000 6 in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Thanks God for Seinfeld. I got Tucker on MSNBC and Dobbs on CNN. Then there is an idiot yelling on CNBC and of course Fox is out of the question. With the exception of funny commercial on those TV stations, they are disgusting.

2007-08-09 13:05:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He seems to be going for ratings. The republicans seem to fixated on the aliens. As correct as Dobbs may be about the illegals, there is venom in his diatribe. He should be able to talk about it without ignoring Iraq and the $12 billions a month we are spending there. I am not saying much about the 100 American deaths and 1200 badly wounded a month.

2007-08-09 12:53:07 · answer #2 · answered by alice r 2 · 1 0

I dont watch Dobbs but he is right to attack illegal immigration as well as the Mexican reconquista groups here in the US and is right to attack China. You claim he isnt smart or fair but the vast majority of the media attacks on the issue of Iraq while never showing the positive achievements so how fair or smart are they? Ohhhhh, I get it, it is ok for them because you agree with what they are saying. Nice

2007-08-09 12:10:16 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I don't think a government as powerful as China's needs to /own/ a TV channel in the US to 'defend' itself from a pundit. China does have access in Washington, though - they paid good money for it - so I suppose if he ever got to be enough of a thorne in thier side, they could use that to bring him down - or just assassinate him, I suppose.

And 'government departments' can certainly fend for themselves as far as I'm concerned.


When I saw your question, I thought he was attacking some really pathetic groups - like victims in Darfur, or drug adicts, or Ron Paul Supporters or something...

2007-08-09 12:18:26 · answer #4 · answered by B.Kevorkian 7 · 0 1

no one tells the actuality for all time. he's no longer a journalist, yet and editorialist. human beings do no longer look to renowned the style. regrettably those days, human beings attempt to blur the line. he's a source for wisdom, yet every person would desire to appreciate that he's view is bias and take it with a grain of salt. you do no longer choose an entire guy or woman for a single mistake. He ought to be slightly extra expert and reveal his assertion extra useful, since he's a public determine. it is previous information, and that i think of you observed my assertion on him. I even have corrected human beings on scientific records, and that i'm getting mine from a pal from public well being. area observe, 60 minutes additionally reported the different area, somewhat the Hispanic Caucus embarrassed themselves by using calling him racist. We latter stumbled on that Lou DObb is married to a Hispanic. They embarrassed themselves, even though it became into one mistake on their area. If we choose them for a single incident, we would evaluate the team a hate team. I warn human beings right here to objective to no longer use that observe so many times, with the aid of fact of waht the Hispanic Caucus did. Sigy ought to be precise that he's a hate monger, yet he's no longer likely a racist. I emphasize no longer likely. area observe, TB is principally led to in the la County by using criminal immigrants, usually a left over while the South-East asian got here. i became into instructed theat they bribed valid to falsify their scientific consequences to get in. in the Inland Empire, the migrant workers are the main reason. As for the yank who have been given TB, regardless of what others ought to assert, he demonstrates why unlawful immigration is a considerable complication in the unfold of TB. as quickly as we found out with regard to the guy having TB, we tracked each united states he handed and took appropriate precaution to ward off further unfold. THey examined people who're maximum probably to be contaminated to make certain that there are no further situations of TB. on the different hand we gained't do the comparable for people who're undocumented. we gained't song their travels. Frankly I see Epidemiological study as being significant.

2016-10-09 21:26:40 · answer #5 · answered by andresen 4 · 0 0

He's a financial guy which probably has something to do with the topics he picks. Kind of like complaining about the weatherman only talking about the weather on TV.

2007-08-09 12:10:00 · answer #6 · answered by x2000 6 · 1 1

he seems to be telling the truth, how ever educated in the public school system makes things hard to understand. Just wait for the i-man

2007-08-15 04:07:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

yes, he seem to have aged a lot and got fat too. How can you be upset with what goes on in America and not be outraged about the war in Iraq.

2007-08-09 12:42:23 · answer #8 · answered by viv 3 · 1 0

So you like people sneaking under (over) the border and draining our economy, putting stress on our hospitals and welfare programs and committing crimes? Well maybe some of us dis agree.

2007-08-09 12:34:26 · answer #9 · answered by Ethan M 5 · 0 2

You are correct, he may be scared to pick a fight with a not so easy target

2007-08-09 12:08:11 · answer #10 · answered by Joshua R 1 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers