If you disagree please state why, also please state who you would rather vote for in the 2008 election.
Thank you, and let's please keep this a civilized conversation.
2007-08-09 11:27:02 · 13 answers · asked by ledzepbadco 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
You might be the only one, go Ron Paul!
2007-08-09 11:30:40 · answer #1 · answered by samhillesq 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Bill was a pragmatist, Hillary is an idealist, which makes her even more dangerous. Biden has been a bumbling fool for a long time; he will not make it on either half of the ticket. Hillary will probably be on the top of the ticket, and she has a very good chance of winning.
I have not made up my mind regarding the R side of the election. Huckabee is good because of his support of the fair tax. Rudy is good because he might carry states that would otherwise be blue, but I'm not a fan of his. Mitt will probably be on one half of the ticket or the other and that's ok with me. Mr. Fred has not yet announced but I like his no nonsense approach to issues and to the press. McCain is not conservative enough, and Sam the Man from Kansas consistently looks like he doesn't get laid enough. I would like to see a Fred/Mike ticket.
2007-08-09 19:51:34 · answer #2 · answered by aka_brian_1040 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, but I don't want to elect candidates who will allow all the 12 to 30 million illegal aliens in the country to stay, and that is all the Dem presidential candidates. Illegal immigration is the most important issue to me, so I won't be voting for any of the Dems who have sold their souls to La Raza!
The Dem ticket will be Clinton/Richardson with Biden for Secretary of State.
I want Duncan Hunter with Tommy Thompson as vice-president.
2007-08-09 20:48:54 · answer #3 · answered by Shane 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I just don't see Hillary letting Biden take control of a conversation. Which spells Biden foot in mouth.
2007-08-09 18:46:19 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Mrs Clinton is all talk. Joe Biden, you can not believe a thing he says. No on both
2007-08-09 18:30:40 · answer #5 · answered by 1st Buzie 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Satin bin Clinton
2007-08-09 18:31:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can think of thousands of people that would be jumping for joy ! They go by the name of TERRORIST!!! With Hillary as President pretty much guarantees there goal of destroying America
2007-08-09 18:39:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No thanks I would vote for an old ellow Dog before I would vote for Hillary, oh wait she is an old yellow dog...hmmm might have to rethink that.
2007-08-13 15:03:11 · answer #8 · answered by cowboy_christian_fellowship 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would like to have it the other way around but at this point I would take anyone over a Republican. Doesn't matter I've had enough of Bush.
2007-08-09 18:32:08 · answer #9 · answered by margie s 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anything as long as George Walker Bush isn't connected to it.
2007-08-09 19:34:28 · answer #10 · answered by Lettie D 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i disagree because i know of and understand the damage the clinton legacy has caused this country and the idea that somehow she didnt know or wasnt involved is patently absurd.
- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
2007-08-09 18:30:43 · answer #11 · answered by koalatcomics 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋