English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-09 10:22:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

16 answers

In a heartbeat

2007-08-09 10:29:22 · answer #1 · answered by Experto Credo 7 · 0 0

Daniel C is a clown. I'm sure he's the guy that believes the moon landing was faked and that the dinosaurs never really existed. To answer your question, I DO believe in the death penalty but as was stated earlier, that is the desired end to their means so I wouldn't execute them. I do, however, believe that they should be put in the "not so" secret prisons abroad and held in solitary confinement and incommunicado for the rest of their lives. Also, for sustenance I'd provide them with the option of succulent pork products or starving to death.

2007-08-09 22:41:44 · answer #2 · answered by camhunt13 2 · 0 0

Sure. But it would present a real problem to execute the leadership of this country.

The towers did not come down due to being struck by airliners; it was demolition. The evidence is frighteningly clear for anyone willing to forget the hype and BS and view it with a clear eye.

Building 7 came down six hours after the first two towers. It sufferened no damage other than some falling debris (much less than #4 and 5 which stayed standing). If you watch #7 come down it is clearly a planned demolition and that takes weeks to plan and execute, not six hours. In that building were irreplaceable records (affidavits, evidence, etc) concerning the Worldcom and Enron scams. How convenient.

The leaseholder of the WTC, guy named Silverstein, had just taken over six weeks before. He took out an insurance policy that is a first in insurance history: it specifically INCLUDES acts of terrorism as a covered loss. How convenient.

As Agent Mulder says "the truth is out there."

2007-08-09 17:48:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

As Dumbledore once said: There are many things worse then death, Tom.
I don't believe in the death penalty. There truly are things much worse. I say that we make them suffer and go through pain. They can be our new lab rats!

2007-08-09 17:54:41 · answer #4 · answered by catie; 3 · 0 0

That death penalty no I don't. They should have every bone in their body broke after that tie them to an airplane for a free flight.

2007-08-09 17:52:21 · answer #5 · answered by Williamstown 5 · 0 0

No. Though they are very unpatriotic and show a lack of intelligence, I don't think they deserve the death penalty.

2007-08-09 17:48:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonnnn24424 5 · 2 1

No, for several reasons:

1) I don't believe in the death penalty for any crime. I don't believe that you can hold the moral high ground and maintain that killing is a hideous crime, if you're willing to engage in it yourself.

2) Most Muslim extremists (not Muslims generally) believe this would qualify as a martyr's death and that they're headed to Paradise to have sex with virgins, so they'd be getting what they want and would be worshipped as martyrs by other fanatics.

3) You create another generation of extremists who are bent on getting revenge for the killing of the "martyr".

Far more satisfying to let them suffer an undignified life in jail in the company of "infidels".

2007-08-09 17:29:43 · answer #7 · answered by ozperp 4 · 5 3

I dont believe in the death penalty for anyone. What are they going to learn when they are dead? Keep them alive and they will never forget what they did. Throw them in jail and make them do something useful to society. The highways are still dirty.

2007-08-09 17:27:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 2

It's an act of war/terrorism, they should be prepared for such a consequence.

2007-08-09 17:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by MrMcKeigue 2 · 0 0

Yes. They helped kill two people I knew who were on the plane which hit the Pentagon.

2007-08-09 17:28:15 · answer #10 · answered by desertviking_00 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers