take the trade. bruce is old, colston is a #1 receiver. carnell is a feature back without alstott to steal touchdowns on the goal line, while betts is splitting time with portis. see if you can pick up vincent jackson from the chargers off of free agency. most people who aren't charger fans never heard of him before. he is their #1 receiver and had plenty of work with rivers.
2007-08-10 01:47:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by BOLT FAN!!!! 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I cant say for sure unless I know who else you have on your roster. If you have another good receiver, then yes, I would do it because Carnell will be the primary back in TB, and I think Colston will be one of the top 5 fantasy receivers this year. Bruce and Jerricho are good, but if you watch the waivers and are smart early in the year, you probably can pick up someone who will put up equal numbers (7-800 yards and 5 or 6 td's). But like I said, it really would depend upon your roster.
2007-08-09 09:04:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jim Baw 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. Carnell Williams isn't necessarily that good. He has only run for 7 touchdowns in his career. Colston is good but its still not worth trading. Not because of Bruce but because of Cotchery. Yeah, he isn't a person many people know but he totaled 7 touchdowns last year and his production can only go up with the Jets and Chad Pennington starting to play better.
2007-08-09 08:32:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, dont do it. Bruce is still a good WR, Cotchery will be a steal this year and if Portis get injured (most likely will) Betts will also help you out. Colston is a good young WR but I think defenses were not ready for him last year, this year will be different, plus now that Horn is out Colston will be doubled up. Im not sure what to say about Cadillac...has not showed much since college days...
2007-08-09 08:27:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by junior v 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
I would not do that trade at all. Bruce is going to get you 750-850 yards this season. Cotchery is the leading man in New York and he has just starting warming up. Betts is going to get a lot of carries down in Washington and he could produce some good numbers. Colston is good but he is going to get you a little more yards then Bruce. So i definatly wouldn't do this trade.
2007-08-09 08:23:05
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Sounds good on the surface. I'd have to see your depth chart to be sure. But, you're trading two marginal receivers for a #1 or #2. And, you're trading a back-up RB (who gets goal-line carries and Portis is injury prone) for a starter who had a terrible year last year. But, especially with the retirement of Allstott, I expect Williams to bounce back to #2 RB status.
2007-08-09 08:25:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by Paul in San Diego 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, bruce will get a lot of yards beside tory holt, betts will score a lot of touchdowns, cotchery also has the ability to get a lot of touchdowns and yards, he is gauranteed a 900 yard season if he doesnt get injured.
colston is good but these 2 players wont get you as many points as the other 3.
2007-08-09 08:24:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
even although Tory Holt is poor this 12 months with the aid of fact of a foul Offensive Line and QB themes, and you would be getting T.O., Peterson is the main suitable RB interior the league and Kevin Smith is on the element of a 2d string RB (Rudi Johnson could be commencing over him). do no longer do the commerce. =P
2016-10-01 23:56:12
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Without seeing your roster it is difficult to say.
But since I can't see your roster, and have to give opionion based solely on the trade. I would say NO.
2007-08-09 08:23:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Robert C 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Betts for Williams seems good,but don't give up Holt
2007-08-09 08:21:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Ace 4
·
0⤊
4⤋