For instance he said that he went into office in 2001 where the country was headed towards a recession....This is a bold face lie. The national dept was GOING down, people had jobs and people had money to spend.
He also said that he created millions of jobs...but what he didn't say is how many jobs were lost from 9,2001 to when Katrina hit, or the fact that these are SERVICE jobs where people make very little.
WMD..total opposite. Claim that Iraq had Al qaida..wrong and many people KNEW that..but Bush ignored it and did what HE wanted, not what was best for the nation.
Wanted Bin Laden "dead or alive" and then said he wasn't that concerned with him a few months later. How much more are we going to have to deal with him?
2007-08-09 04:25:14 · 16 answers · asked by Fedup Veteran 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
hes a moron honney and we have lost alot of our rights what hapened to people sticking up together and takin the fool out of office? And for your question on how long... Until the next election just pray we dont get someone worse than him!
2007-08-09 04:31:10 · answer #1 · answered by jennifer h 2 · 7⤊ 6⤋
because you are so uniformed and have a clouded judgement that you you don't know what the truth is.
now people have money to spend with the DOW going crazy and the fact that 95% of the country is employed.
the million jobs is a total, so that would include that amount.
what were the chemicals that Saddam used on people at Dujail, and what about Hillary Clinton and Ted Kenendy, John Kerry, Barbra Boxer, and Harry Reid and the other Democrats who also believed that he had WMD'S.
epspecially if you remember Saddam wouldn't let the UN inspectors in on different occasions to inspect the factories.
not concerned with him? what about all the troops we still have in Afghanistan are they just there for a picnic? If we aren't concerned with him now, it's because he is probably dead, and if not he is stuck in a mountain somewere, and remember he was very sick too, so he is most likely dead.
2007-08-09 04:40:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Back in the 1980s we used to say, "George Washington could not tell a lie, Richard Nixon could not tell the truth, and Ronald Reagan can't tell the difference." I'm afraid Bush belongs more to the Nixon tradition.
2007-08-09 04:40:30 · answer #3 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The dot com bubble had burst and we were headed for recession...that is true...
Unemployment rate is lower now than it was...most Katrina victims who were employed before the storm are employed again...the ones who are not didn't work before...this statement is also true.
WMD...Saddam used them on the Kurds...they existed...intelligence from all over the world came to the same conclusion...another true statement...
Wanted dead or alive...he is still wanted...there are more pressing issues at the moment than a hunt for one man who is believed to possibly already be dead...the hunt hasn't ended but it is not our countries #1 issue at the moment...so yet again, another true statement....
Obviously your opinion has a couple of flaws...keep reading and you will manage to work them out. Have a nice day.
2007-08-09 04:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by Erinyes 6 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I'm only going to respond to your last two lies.
We did find WMDs and we captured one of Saddam's top generals who told us that Saddam had shipped most of his WMDs to Syria. Read the links, some are even from the BS liberal media you love so much.
Bin Laden is dead and has been sense Tora Bora that's why we haven't seen an up to date video of him sense then. I work with photos and videos and I can tell you that there were no new footage. In some they went back even further to keep his scare going.
2007-08-09 04:33:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 5⤋
Most of what you're say is untrue and/or twisted to suit your rant. Maybe the reason Bush seems to say what is opposite from the truth to you is that you don't really know what the truth is.
2007-08-09 04:32:26 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 4⤋
For your information lady and you need alot of it the U.S. recession you are whining about started in November/December of 2000, an entire month before Bush took office, think before you just blab the Liberal talking points
2007-08-09 04:29:40 · answer #7 · answered by Greg 7 · 7⤊ 6⤋
As Democrats are opposed to every tax reduction this statement is almost ludicrous. The largest obstacle to gaining wealth is taxes. The single biggest issue affecting middle class families on a daily basis is taxes. The middle class taxpayer pays close to 50% of their income in taxes. Please consider the following: federal income tax, state income tax, state sales tax, property tax, gas tax, tolls, taxes on alcohol and cigarettes, utility taxes, automobile registration fees, county surtaxes. Democrats are not for the middle class and break down their support into groups. They get funds and count on votes from women by being pro-choice, minorities for supporting affirmative action, gays for supporting gay rights, unions for not supporting school vouchers, and environmentalists supporting things such as not drilling for oil in Alaska and global warming.
2007-08-09 04:31:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 6⤋
Do you have links that support these claims? Sounding educated and informed requires evidence. If this is just your opinion, than you should state it in your description.
2007-08-09 04:31:42 · answer #9 · answered by Lisa M 5 · 5⤊ 5⤋
Your right! get em tiger.
2007-08-09 08:46:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋