Is good for big corporation but not for the common people. Now like always they are going to say that if the master is happy then the slaves are happy but we know that is BS.
2007-08-09 04:28:51
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush will get to that part of his hidden agenda after he gets done with global warming, knocking down a few more bridges, and send another hurricane or two into Louisiana.
He's just busy right now with working on his tornado weather machine in his barn down in Texas.
Don't worry... he'll wipe out those borders when he gets time.
2007-08-09 04:32:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sure, it could be similar to the European Union. It would vertually erase the current immigration problems. Erasing the borders may even save money by eliminating the need for border patrol. Eliminating the drug traffic will now need to be moved to the Southern Mexican border.
2007-08-09 04:31:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by texconte 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Sounds like a pretty fragile "union" to me.
Wow...it amazes me how all you liberals are so psychic about every "hidden agenda" the Bush administration has!
2007-08-09 04:27:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by bradxschuman 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Do you mean NAFTA? North America Free Trade Agreement?
Excellent idea. Capitalism at its best. With no tarriffs, each territory can produce what they are most efficient at producing, keeping price down and increasing your spending power.
2007-08-09 04:32:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Thomas K 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
As a Canadian, I would hate that. That would mean Canada's natural resources would be sucked south to the US in about 9.7 seconds.
2007-08-09 04:25:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bill W 【ツ】 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
A thousand times NO!
2007-08-09 04:25:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by regerugged 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's the best "idia" ever. It's a terrible idea, however.
2007-08-09 04:28:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
HELL NO!
2007-08-09 05:33:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by jmf931 6
·
0⤊
0⤋