Is "what will the government do to help stave off the loss of 'good' manufacturing jobs" really a tough question? It's what his audience wants to hear. That seems to me to be the easy question.
A tough question might be: why, in an economy that constantly provides you as a consumer with new and better products and services, and why, in a country that gives you, for free, an education through the 12th grade - i.e., calculus, physics, trig, a foreign language - do some people think they're entitled to receive a salary high enough to feed a family of four for spending seven hours a day on an assembly line performing a repetitive, menial task that anyone with a 2nd grade education could perform?
2007-08-09
03:42:49
·
6 answers
·
asked by
truthisback
3
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
But stiggo the sixty million dollar question is - who decides what is "appropriate" - the market or stiggo?
2007-08-09
03:53:53 ·
update #1
Given - uh, unemployment is 4.6% - - - - not exactly a problem.
2007-08-09
03:54:28 ·
update #2
And WHAT "war on the middle class" - the middle class is smaller in proportion to the whole only because there's been an exodus UPWARD.
2007-08-09
03:55:01 ·
update #3
Who else - if that were true, we'd all be making minimum. Ultimately it is the consumers who decide the wages.
2007-08-09
03:55:45 ·
update #4
Josh you are an idiot, "working is working" - no, people are paid differently because they add different levels of value. What I did in high school, which some of my classmates chose to continue to do for a career, isn't 1/10th as difficult as what I do now, which is why I'm paid a lot more now than I was summers in high school.
2007-08-10
08:00:53 ·
update #5
But I can't explain that to them. It's like the children's book "fish is fish" - a frog trying to explain to a fish what life is like on land. Fish is fish - work is work - same idea.
2007-08-10
08:01:39 ·
update #6