2007-08-09 00:46:58 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Royalty
It's a little known fact that Camilla is an expert 'sagger makers bottom knocker'. This fine British tradition has been under threat of extinction for many years and it was Camilla's father who encouraged her to take up the practice after seeing a professional sagger makers bottom knocker beat the panel on a TV edition of 'What's my Line?'
2007-08-10 05:06:18 · answer #1 · answered by Namlevram 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
Camilla gives everyone hope. The hope and realization that love shouldnt be about looks or color or greed or religion but something that is felt deep within. You see the old Prince would exchange very hot exchanges letters and when you look at Camilla you could think no way,,not her..but yes way it was her and still is. I have met some beautiful people that arent physically attractive and I have met some beautiful physically people that are empty shells. So its about the soul and chemistry and its not always what we see but what we feel.
2007-08-09 07:55:52 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
I never knew being good looking was a skill.
Are YOU good at anything? ;)
I'm American, so don't really care about English royalty, but some celebrities choose to be famous with no discernable talent, and some are famous by association no matter how much they prefer to shun the limelight. I never saw anything on this side of the Atlantic that revealed to me that Camilla wanted to be famous.
2007-08-09 07:51:28 · answer #3 · answered by Buttercup 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
I am a Yank, but follow royal news to some degree. Personally, I think that the only thing at which Camilla has any skill is destroying other people's marriages and being a conniving *****. If I were able to make a recommendation to the Queen, I would suggest that Camilla and Charles both be stripped of any titles and that Charles be forced to abdicate to William. Charles' and Camilla's behavior is galling, and they should not be given any precedence at all. To the best of my understanding, Elizabeth may name her successor, and although tradition would dictate that it be Charles, I think he should be treated like the adulterous lecher that he is and that his son should be given the chance to rule.
2007-08-09 10:13:34 · answer #4 · answered by conductorbrat 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
It's obvious that she's good at keeping Charles from being any more of a fool than he can help being. Considering what duties are in the future for him, that's going to be important.
2007-08-11 10:55:11 · answer #5 · answered by bh8153 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She bowls a consistant 273 and that's a handycapper in the world of Kingpin professional bowling! What a Gal!
2007-08-09 07:53:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
yep.she has been good at keeping a prince in love with her for over 30 years!!!!
but she is not good looking.with all the money-and pressure-from diana being so pretty-how come this one does not look for a make over with the best make up and hair staff in the world?
2007-08-09 09:24:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Apparently Charles thinks she's good at something. And that's what counts.
2007-08-09 10:20:25 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
I am not sure because im not familiar with her. However, since she is famous, you can relate her to just about all the famous people of today what are they good for? For example, Lindsay Lohan..Paris Hilton...Britney Spears...so on and so forth.............The big ol box of good for nothings..that make really good money??!!!
2007-08-09 07:55:39 · answer #9 · answered by becky b 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, she's good at sucking on the royal family's blood. And was also good at killing softly Diana's sanity. If I just had the chance of being face-to face with her, I'll tell her everything I think of her....and they are not gonna be good. Tell her she's just a marriage wrecking w-hore and a selfish bit-ch.
2007-08-09 17:23:51 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋