How come the world trade center falling didnt fallow any of the laws of physics, it looks more like a building being leveled than, one being toppled over by the combined mass and momentum of a plane. Not to mention it takes sufficient oxygen and heat to melt steal. One could counter that a
"terrorist" put explosive charges on the inside of the building but then why didn't the government take in to consideration any of the firemen's comments on how the steel looked or include it in the report? I'm no conspiracy theorist, I'm just wondering why the heck things around this event are so unclear.
2007-08-08 20:35:58 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
There supposed to be unclear. They have way to many questions left unanswered (molted metal, time of fall, bld 7, etc) Why didn't building 5 fall?
Brings me to wonder, how were the bodies of flight 77 identified (but one child) but nothing left of the aircraft (titanium, hardened steel)
2007-08-08 21:59:34 · answer #1 · answered by done 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is nothing unusual about how the buildings fell, given the structural weakness near the top. The laws of physics allow for the result we saw. The strangest thing about the events of 9/11 is the lack of information about the "black boxes" from the airplanes. In every crash of an airliner the main focus of the investigation is the recovery of the onboard data recorders, and no one has said anything about them in the 9/11 incidents. The black boxes should have been easy to recover from the planes that crashed in Pennsylvania and at the Pentagon, and were certainly the focus of the debris search of the WTC wreakage that took place in NJ.
2007-08-08 20:38:36 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i'd purely say connect the club i've got been given reported too for a manner i answer a question even though it became into humorous . Yahoo is changing the way we answer and extra are being get rid of with the question or answer purely have relaxing with solutions and not used something that gets you reported returned
2016-10-09 15:46:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK. I'm a physicist. Which laws of physics did the trade center collapse not follow?
2007-08-09 00:44:13 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Steel myth is a myth, the steel did not melt
2007-08-08 20:38:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was just an American conspiracy
2007-08-08 20:54:32 · answer #6 · answered by star 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think the key phrase is 'it looks more like'.
http://usinfo.state.gov/media/misinformation.html
2007-08-08 20:42:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Cover up...typical US government...why r u surprised?
2007-08-08 20:38:36 · answer #8 · answered by NotTheStatusQuo 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋