Is that a bad thing for the wrestler? does that mean the he/she sucked? or what?
2007-08-08 19:26:02 · 5 answers · asked by The Masterpiece 4 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I wasnt bashing Smackdown since my favorite wrestler is there...I was just wondering since RAW is the big s**t...maybe that wrestler wasnt enough for RAW material...
2007-08-08 19:32:21 · update #1
It can be either. Sometimes wrestlers are sent there to hone their skills in the ring/on the mic (MVP, Mr. Kennedy to recent examples). Other times they are just sent there because they have no room for them on Raw.
2007-08-08 19:30:57 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wrestling is like..acrobatics..body building..and acting all in one.If wrestling were real there would be deaths from broken necks, lots and lots of blood..you know.
Who knows if there actually is a difference though, but as a matter of fact I do like to watch wrestling, Undertaker!!!
2007-08-09 02:35:54 · answer #2 · answered by Matt 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no
becuase raw is starting to suck now adays becuz they treat it like a show, not a sporting event
2007-08-09 02:29:58 · answer #3 · answered by Nick P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Watch your mouth!
It is The Rock's show!
2007-08-09 02:28:55 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
check your gramer, er.. grammar.
2007-08-09 02:32:05 · answer #5 · answered by naked snake 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋