English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

we are guinea pigs to the aliens. aliens exist and we are a profuct of them.
Everyone is familiar with the supercontinent that existed billions of years ago on earth consisting of all the continents put together and which slowly separated to give us the continents we have today. I believe there was a superplanet which existed even more billions of years ago consisteng of all 9 planets (mercury, venus, earth, mars, saturn, jupiter, uranus, and pluto and whatever the other one was) - all 9 planets were attached as ONE planet and something struck this super planet years ago dividing it into the 9 planets as we know them today. The moons were part of the planets they most closely orbit. our moon was once where the atlantic, pacific, or indian ocean are today(probably the pacific ocean because when you move our continents to form the supecontinent the gap where the moon would have come from would be where the pacific ocean is today). Why haven't scientists acknowledged this possibility?

2007-08-08 17:59:30 · 5 answers · asked by xfileaddict1969 2 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

5 answers

ummmm..

then explain all the other galaxies....

we are a product of the big bang..
think a central point ona grid..
in that central point was this large mass of matter..

well it bomed and sent everything in this outward ring across the universe...


but even from what i said that coudl be supported.. a large mass being struck by another forming the planets..

the biger picture is none knows fr sure because we werent there to observe it..

for all we know there coudl hav ebeen several big bangs and big crunchs before we were finally created... there is no way to sure because upona big crunch and big bang all that evidence of previous planets is erased with trillions and trillions of years from the infinite possible then to now..


good question though... id def ask my teacher, idk about a scientist though..

2007-08-08 18:08:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Well I not sure I have every heard of the theory you are discussing. But there are other theories of planet formation.
The was a fellow by the of Hannes Alfven who proposed at theory that the terrestrial planets Mercury, Venus, Mars, Earth and the Moon plus Ceres the asteriod form in a different process than the Jovial planets Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus and Neptune. He based this on the principle that the terrestrial planets have a large anount of iron, nickel and oxygen compare to the Jovial. So he formulate a theory of not only gravitation separation of the planets but also magnetic. In fact if you calculated the oribtal and spin angular momenta of the terrestrial planets you will find that the can be resolve into a single planet facing the sun at about the Earth's orbit. This could explain the strange resonance between Mars, Venus, Mercury, Earth and the Moon. If the Earth originate as the first sunspot on the collapsing proto-sun. It is a interesting theory to explore I not sure any could demonstrated it conclusively as there is a great deal of fudge factor in the precise density of the sun as it collapses to form a star and when precisely the nuclear reaction would be sufficient to create sunspots.

2007-08-09 02:28:52 · answer #2 · answered by alints_2000 4 · 0 1

Sorry to interrupt you from your xfile viewing and bring you into the real world for a couple of minutes (but hey, you asked for it didn't you)...

Since you are a guinea pig, you may not be able to comprehend much of this but your idea is pure fiction. I hate to be the one to tell you this but even the other guinea pigs in your cage will not believe you either. Don't be surprised if they keep you from the food dish and water bottle.

Human scientists usually only consider hypothetical ideas that are based upon common sense and have at least a slim shred of a chance of being true. Voltaire was speaking to you when he said that 'common sense is not all that common'. I understand that not everyone can be at the high end of the learning curve but for god's sake at least try to meet the standards at the low end.

There is probably no hope for you to be knowledgeable or intelligent or wise but if you don't understand something, say so, or be quiet.

My last advice to you is DO NOT bring this up to a teacher or scientist unless you want to reveal your lack of understanding of what you are talking about.

2007-08-09 11:39:12 · answer #3 · answered by Troasa 7 · 1 1

because our entire solar system was created by an ancient star that blew up creating a supernova spewing out all these compounds which mixed creating a new smaller star, (the sun) and 9 planets that werecreated seperately.

if they was a planet that big, it wouldnt revolve around the sun, the sun would revolve around it!and their would have to be something huge that made it blow up


but actually your theory is true, except it was a giant star that exploded andmade our solar system

2007-08-09 01:48:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

The tiny fragment of a brain you use today was once part of a larger, better brain. Something came along, smashed into it, and nearly destroyed it. That which remains isn't used very effectively.

2007-08-09 01:21:50 · answer #5 · answered by Daniel P 3 · 4 1

Analogies don't guarantee validity. Scientists haven't acknowledged this possibility because no one has published it in a "reputable" journal.

2007-08-09 02:00:42 · answer #6 · answered by cattbarf 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers