Just a very simple question. Please imagine the things happening after such thing occurs: what the governments will do (especially US government), what the course will be, what the world will react, etc.
Please be serious and enthusiast. I don't appreciate too simple or foolish answers.
2007-08-08 15:38:14 · 33 answers · asked by Nguyá»?n Lê Minh 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Deep in the republicans caves, the think-masters are asking themselves that question.
And then, in a low voice, slowly enunciated, one of the elders say: "We have to make it happen in a way that will have maximum effect, that will cause the public to blame the democrats and no one ever again will doubt the wisdom of supporting the war on terror". A second somewhat younger voice, then says, "It has to be timed perfectly and be done by professionals".
2007-08-16 14:17:36 · answer #1 · answered by johnfarber2000 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I had not heard of this term before your question was asked but read the different websites and.... it's questionable. My local disc jockey is close with Alan Lamy, a Texas/Houston energy analyst, he has him on his show weekly. He has been saying on the show that for the last couple of weeks everyone he knows who are stock savvy are saying that the market is going to crash. That it was supposed to have happened already with the way things have been looking. He even mentioned how he saw figures on something that were for the following day and that the next day the numbers matched. He did not delve into it. (I don't think he's into conspiracy theories.) But still, it's mighty fishy. As far as reaction goes, I would be irate. I already feel that 9/11 was an "inside" job to one extent or another. The real question is whether or not Americans will ban together this time through grief and mourning and demand justice for the corruption amongst us.
2016-04-01 06:48:04 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think that before it was a country in shock. Now they are realizing that it is not a win able war. the Muslims will not stop.
A mushroom cloud over the Los Angeles Harbor will trigger all out anarchy. People are at the breaking point with policy's that are not working. They have had sons and daughters come home from Iraq with very different stories. Some are permanently injured or cripple and some didn't come back at all. They are at the breaking point, and I feel it would be a blood bath of epic proportions. Bush would be impeached and it would probably bring the soldiers home immediately and then they could get nuked. It is a last resort but I see it in the future. It is the only way they will stop. Until they are forced to stop they won't. How many more men has to die before the public realizes that?
2007-08-08 15:45:45 · answer #3 · answered by Steven 6 · 4⤊ 5⤋
The US won’t nuke the Middle East because that is where the oil is. The oil companies simply wouldn’t allow it. The people who even cite this as a possibility clearly don’t understand the nature of the conflict that we’re involved in.
2007-08-15 02:04:25 · answer #4 · answered by relevant inquiry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not to sure what will be the immediate after math, but the fear mongering and finger pointing should be at all highs here in the U.S..
as for the rest of the world, i would imagine that every country on the terrorist list would go to high alert and the rest would try to calm down the U.S.military
2007-08-15 08:12:42 · answer #5 · answered by Constipated CON. 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think the reaction will be very different then last time. People will not sit idly by and let Bush and his croneys do nothing. I think the world will be at war. I think that is the outcome we can expect that they will do something.
Muslims believe that God has given them the world they are waiting for the Muslim clerics to give the world for a jihad to take over the world. So they want a disaster to occur for their God to intervene and save them.
But what is going to happen is I think the American people will demand the troops come out of the middle east and then they will drop some bombs on them like they did Japan.
when the war was taking to many causalities and there was no more soldiers to send in that is what they did before.
they only thing holding them back now is that those people have oil. when they decide they can get it somewhere else with a lot less trouble they are history.
2007-08-08 15:53:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 5⤋
It is not if, but when, and when it happens, it will be bad. There is a lot of surplus U-235 sloshing around from the Russian nuclear program, and thirty pounds of it will make a Hiroshima-type bomb that could fit in a case the size of an office desk. Making such a bomb is trivially easy; I designed one when I was in seventh grade. (This is not true of the plutonium type device that North Korea tried to explode a few months ago -- those are much more high tech.) Wave bye-bye to New York City. And what will we do about it? I haven't the faintest idea; I cannot think of a single target in terrorist land that would be worth a nuclear weapon.
2007-08-08 15:50:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 4⤋
If we maintain strong leadership in the White House, we could say good-bye to those ME government leaders who have long been encouraging terrorism against the US.
I do believe Bush would pull out all the stops and be justified in doing so.
As far as our allies are concerned, they may or, may not join us in our efforts, but in the end, it would make no difference. We have the ability to take care of our own problems either way.
2007-08-08 15:53:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean "if"?
I think that the Muslims have shown that they have nothing but contempt for America. They are an intollerant religion and they fully intend to destroy American culture.
There are more attacks coming.
2007-08-16 00:55:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As Hillabill they had plans drawn up for y2k.I saw it on Art Bells web site.
2007-08-15 19:22:00 · answer #10 · answered by ak6702 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋