English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

aside from getting thing registered with the government or w/e, and i have heard about the method or idea of mail yourself your own written works, can a blog serve as a proof of copyright? does blogspot(blogger) have any rights to what we write, or is it all of ours?

2007-08-08 15:03:57 · 4 answers · asked by ihaveques 2 in Politics & Government Law & Ethics

4 answers

copyright refers only to the fixed form. what you need to do is either make a printout, or burn a permanent CD of the text. the problem with a blog or any electronic only media is it can be altered at anytime. you need to be able to produce in court a tangible fixed copy of your copyright claim. you don't need to file a registration, but you do need the equivalent to the materials that would have to be submitted to get a registration.

2007-08-09 08:56:35 · answer #1 · answered by lare 7 · 0 0

maximum heavily you would be waiting to coach they had no foundation for what they reported approximately you. in fact they made it as much as attempt to harm you. i) The plaintiff could teach ebook of the defamatory assertion. ebook ability the making popular of the defamatory assertion, after that's been written or spoken, to three guy or woman different than the guy of whom it rather is written or spoken; ii) The plaintiff could teach that the defamation refers back to the plaintiff; and iii) The plaintiff could teach that the assertion is defamatory. in basic terms positioned, a defamatory assertion is "a pretend assertion to a guy or woman's discredit". b) Upon data of ebook, the regulation makes countless presumptions in prefer of the plaintiff: i) That the assertion is fake; ii) That it became revealed with malice; and iii) contained in terms of libel or slander consistent with se, the plaintiff has suffered injury. c) De fences: i) fact. ii) common remark: The defendant is authorized to remark on data somewhat reported, as long because of the fact the remark is common and the defendant isn't led to by rather malice. iii) Privilege: On particular events, the courts have held that coverage and convenience require that a guy or woman could be loose from accountability for the ebook of defamatory words. those events are characterize privileges. Privilege would be absolute, including statements interior the abode of Commons or the courts. that's qualified, in that that's lost if the ebook is unnecessarily huge or made with malice. iv) harmless dissemination: This final protection is probably needed in cyberlibel and could be reported later interior the paper.

2016-12-11 14:38:59 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think so, but double check the copyright organization web site

2007-08-08 15:11:46 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Unless the website states that what you have posted is copryghted once you post it then no. Anything you post online is fair game...unless you can prove that you've had it copyrighted it prior to posting it.

2007-08-08 15:13:41 · answer #4 · answered by Shannon A 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers