Really, were the Cleveland Cavaliers going to win at least one game in the finals?
2007-08-08 14:31:01 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Basketball
I am not saying Cleveland 's better with LeBron.
What I am saying is that would they have won at least one game even at home?
2007-08-08 14:39:44 · update #1
i mean isn't better
2007-08-08 14:40:11 · update #2
no cleveland is better wit lebron
2007-08-08 14:34:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Kobe had played for the Cavaliers they would have made the NBA Finals every year in the pathetic East. Kobe plays in the West where the number one seed in the East is dropped to a sixth seed in the West. Kobe is good enough to win at least two games by himself.
2007-08-08 18:13:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Kobe definitely has more experience... but who would play SF, Kobe? they already had Larry Hughes so I'm not sure if Kobe's addition would have helped them at all since he wouldn't work well with the other players on the Cavs, Lebron definitely works better with the Cav's offense and defense. Either one of them wouldn't have won as long as they have no supporting cast.
2007-08-08 14:41:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
um.. this is a tought question but i think lebron has proven himself especially at the east conference finals in the game agains the pistons were he scored the team last 29 points and a total of 48. Bryant is also a good player that can also take control but i think he is a little ball hugger although a very good one. to me lebron has more leadership qualities they are better off with him.
2007-08-12 14:04:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if kobe was on the team the cavs would have won at least one game
kobe is at this point a better defender, scorer, clutch scorer
also kobe is an underrated passer he would pass more but when your passing to brian cook and kwame brown its not going to happen
and kobe could slide over to the 3 but the lakers dont need him to with luke and they dont have a good backup sg
2007-08-08 14:55:55 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the lakers almost beat the suns in the first round last year, with nobody except kobe, and the suns are argueably better than the spurs. so i'd go a step farther and say that if kobe was on the cavaliers with larry hughes, daniel gibson and Ilgauskas, i believe that they would have won the finals. Ilgauskas to rebound kobes missed shots, daniel gibson to shoot open 3's after they dbl kobe, and larry hughes to, uhh, do whatever it is that he does...
go kobe!@
2007-08-08 14:37:59 · answer #6 · answered by Paul L 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
You never can know. But the odds are that they would have, given the fact that Kobe is more mature than Lebron. Also, its easier for a shooter to get hot than a slasher.
2007-08-08 14:34:55 · answer #7 · answered by john b 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think so.
It seems that kobe has the stronger desire 2 win and obviously, he can score much more points!
Imagine another 81 points in the NBA Finals!!!
How exciting@_@
2007-08-08 14:44:22 · answer #8 · answered by zero 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Kobe's playing they don't even make the Playoff just like the Lakers.
2007-08-09 01:40:49 · answer #9 · answered by SoccerClipCincy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think that kobe would not have let the cavs get swept they would have at least won a game with him so i think your right
2007-08-08 15:00:41 · answer #10 · answered by WVU rules 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no.. they will be easily swept as well. Lebron is a much better fit on the roster of the cavs because he can score and make his teammate better not like kobe
2007-08-08 14:44:54 · answer #11 · answered by RLota 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋