President Hillary...GET USE TO IT...can America handle 8 more years of peace & prosparity ?

Question

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070808/ts_nm/usa_politics_democrats_dc

Answer 1

I see No-Child-Left-Behind was before your time.

Answer 2

I like her but let me enlighten you. If you think she is going to do things much different then our president right now, your mistaken. The problem Pres. Bush had was that he had to set the table for all these world issues because no other country has the nads to step up to the plate. I would support her and think she can do a good job. Bush, on the other hand, had a lot of bad advice and probably made mistakes as well that could of been avoided.
But what it all comes down to is that she would have to tackle a lot of the same problems, and hopefully comes out better than it did for Pres. Bush thus far. All and all, we have to support our President no matter who it is.

Answer 3

Look,even the othe dems are questioning that survey. Durrrrrrr!

"The Obama and Edwards camps are dismissing the polling numbers, pointing out that opinion surveys over the years have offered a skewed picture."

Answer 4

The neocons just can't wait. They are going to pull every dirty trick and lie in their huge book of such things so she will need to be alert. Her husband defeated Newton Leroy Gingrich and so it will be good to have him around for advice to go after more of the neocons.

Answer 5

Will she return the paintings they stole from the White House the first time?

Answer 6

America is not going to vote in a female president, GET USED TO IT. Sorry to disappoint...

Answer 7

BWAAAH HAAAH...EIGHT YEARS OF PROSPERITY??? I DONT THINK SO...IF GOD FORBID SHE GOT IN..ITS EIGHT MORE YEARS OF THE CLINTON..." LEGACY"

- The only president ever impeached on grounds of personal malfeasance
- Most number of convictions and guilty pleas by friends and associates*
- Most number of cabinet officials to come under criminal investigation
- Most number of witnesses to flee country or refuse to testify
- Most number of witnesses to die suddenly
- First president sued for sexual harassment.
- First president accused of rape.
- First first lady to come under criminal investigation
- Largest criminal plea agreement in an illegal campaign contribution case
- First president to establish a legal defense fund.
- First president to be held in contempt of court
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions
- Greatest amount of illegal campaign contributions from abroad
- First president disbarred from the US Supreme Court and a state court
you lose big time on this one liberal.

Answer 8

A vote for Hillary will be just Another Step Closer to Socialism
The people from the richest countrie said that they would like the government to sock it to the rich. (that want include the politicians millions )Of course, those who are not rich tend to get more in the way of government programs so, of course they want to tax the rich. How on Earth could they survive without the redistribution of income? Studies show they pay far less than they consume and that the rich consume far less than they pay so the only way to even things out is to tax the rich to death. One of the problems though, is that people in government have a funny idea of what constitutes rich and people who are well off but in no way rich get taken to the cleaners by the “shire reeve.”
The idea of redistributing wealth for unnecessary items (and a huge part of what the government spends is unnecessary) is just socialism. Each according to his means and redistribution of property so that everyone is the same. All members of Congress are guilty of wasting taxpayer money, there is no doubt about that. The Democrats however, are the ones who live their lives to tax the wealthy and then pass that money out among the serfs who have become indentured to the left. This has been going on for some time and even limp wristed panty waists like Martin O’Malley of Baltimore are getting in on the act with progressive taxes and other economically disastrous schemes designed to give those who do not know how to manage money more of it to give away.

As if it is not bad enough that those surveyed have been subjected to government stupidity for so long that they think it is good to screw the rich, now they are saying they want the government to decide how private businesses should run. The government does not belong sticking its nose in the business of business. It is up to private companies as to how much they pay their employees including those at the very top who receive a lot of money. I happen to think some of the sums are obscene but it is none of my business unless I hold stock in those companies because the stockholder is who the company answers to. Government should not decide how much a CEO or any other employee gets paid (including the other end with regard to the minimum wage).

I think it is obscene that men get paid millions of dollars to hit, throw, and catch a ball but that is up to the people who own the team to decide. I do not go to any baseball games because I do not want to pay a fortune for entertainment so some spoiled ballplayer can earn more in a year than I will in a lifetime, but that is MY choice. It is not the government’s to tell me what to support or to tell private companies how much they may pay their employees. When the government gets mixed up in telling private businesses how to run, we are one step closer to the Socialism the ACLU and Left would love to see take over this country.

There is a problem in the world and it is not the fact that some people are rich. The problem is that so many people have been enticed to feed at the teat of government that we have entire classes of people who have no ability to take care of themselves and they have no desire or motivation to do so. Europe has been this way for a while as Socialism becomes more and more pronounced and people pay more in taxes to feed the insatiable appetite of those who have become addicted to hand outs from their friendly elected officials.

The US is well on the way there thanks to past Democratic administrations that fostered the environment of welfare and bred classes of people unable to fend for or take care of themselves. Hurricane Katrina brought this ugly truth to light when people stood in knee deep water looking around for the government to come swooping in to save them instead of getting the hell out of the water. People did not have the ability to get out of town because they figured the government would care for them. They were let down when their Mayor felt the same way. He figured he did not have to get people out with the 500 buses because the federal government would swoop in and bring the Greyhound buses he demanded. A total failure of the welfare class by those who allowed it to fester to the boil it is today.

We need fewer taxes and we need government to let business run without interference. This is how an economy will grow and how people can become wealthier. It is time to scrap the government and start fresh, a do over, if you will.

We can change government by getting rid of every incumbent in 2008. Vote them all out of office and start over.

Answer 9

oh thanks...I just ate dinner and you have made me laugh so hard that i might hurl massive chuncks...lmfao....get real...have you noticed all the programs she intends to try and fund with you tax dollars??? get real skippy...lmfao...ohhh that was good!

Answer 10

Still early. Don't put all your cankles in one shoe.