English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Obama said he'll have to wait until Bonds hits one more home run before he can make a decision on whether he'd invite him to the White House as President. After hitting 755 home runs. and with only 1 more home run to hit, you would think that Obama could make up his mind on Bonds.
Guess not.
But there are a few decisions He has ALREADY made. 1 - he will never use nuclear weapons under any circumstance. 2 - he will attack our ally Pakistan over the objection of its President.

This Bonds thing has him stumped............. unbelievable.

2007-08-08 13:48:28 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

11 answers

Yep and if al qaeda attacks us 755 times, Obama will want to wait until there is 1 more attack before he strikes back.
Obama just got called out looking. Game's over.

2007-08-08 13:51:50 · answer #1 · answered by charbatch 3 · 1 4

For crying out loud. A social visit because of a hit. By the time of the election Bonds would have gone way over the record of Hank Aaron. President Obama, (sounds good doesn't it) can invite anyone he wants to the White House. Personal attacks are a typical tactic of the far right because they are terrified of discussions of real issues. They know they will lose big time when their true beliefs are exposed.

2007-08-08 21:04:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

You're misquoting Obama in more than one of your examples. Me, I'd prefer he never invite Bonds to the White House, no matter how he might joke about doing so; I'm glad he's against the massacre of dropping a nuclear bomb on anybody; and I'm glad he's willing to admit that, IF we cannot get satisfaction from the president of Pakistan, he'd be willing to go after the terrorists hiding there anyway. Last time I heard. those are the terrorists who murdered American citizens on 9/11, NOT Saddam Hussein.

2007-08-08 20:52:15 · answer #3 · answered by Vaughn 6 · 2 2

Bud Selig doesn't even know what to do and he's the commissioner of baseball, you're worried about the President making a decision on whether he should honor a sports figure, I think it shows that he hasn't put a lot of time thinking about unimportant matters

2007-08-08 21:15:11 · answer #4 · answered by cthomp99 3 · 2 1

There is a myriad of issues that are more pressing than Barry Bonds. It is really not a good idea to see him as less of a candidate just because he won't take a firm stance on some athlete.

2007-08-08 20:54:23 · answer #5 · answered by SoulDawg 4 UGA 6 · 3 1

I trust him over most. Bonds shouldn't be invited,he has a drug problem,i'll write Obama and let him know. Bonds should not be allowed to play or hold a record. lifetime ban

2007-08-08 20:59:20 · answer #6 · answered by here to help 7 · 1 1

Are you really this desperate to find something about Obama to criticise? If this is the best you can do perhaps he is a better candidate than I first imagined. I better go have another look at him.

2007-08-08 21:04:06 · answer #7 · answered by Sageandscholar 7 · 2 1

Every day it becomes more apparent that Obama is better suited for the "green" party.

2007-08-08 20:54:19 · answer #8 · answered by nileslad 6 · 2 1

I'm not realy into sports so i dont care, but obama is full of crap and i hope he dosent win, aswell as hillar

2007-08-08 20:57:10 · answer #9 · answered by F-22 Raptor 2 · 1 1

You obviously did not listen to his speech.

http://my.barackobama.com/page/invite/AFLCIOforum

2007-08-08 21:30:31 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers