Which presidential candidate will do the most good for the environment?

Answer 1

The one that becomes fertilizer first.

Answer 2

i dont really kno sum ppl say that ms.clinton is runnig cause its some plan so that mr.cliton can b in the wite house again and do stuff his way for another 4 yrs.
BUt i think that Obama, Clinton, Al Gore, Edwards have a pretty good chane in winning this elections but they should really focus in how they make the people safe. because if u rememba bout the home invasion something like that shouldnt b happening u cant put ex-covicts and hope they'll be good, and i kno that u cant do anything to the person until hes done sumthing bad but come on instead of speanding ALOT of money on the war[which i kno is helpful] they should think about the people and how to keep the people safe from harm they should focous on that. i kno u might say thats y we have senators and mayors but THE president is the one that should b givin money to the mayors/senators so they can help us

Answer 3

Dennis Kucinich

Answer 4

Barack Obama or Dennis Kucinich.

Answer 5

Obama and Romney are very good for the environment, and if Al Gore agrees to be a candidate...then he's the best in this particular field.

Answer 6

I'm a Ron Paul supporter, but from all of my Research Dennis K. will do the most in that aspect :)

Answer 7

I would say Fred Thompson or Giuliani since there would not be anything much worse for our environment than a nuclear bomb exploding in an American city.

Answer 8

Kucinich for sure! From his website...

"The EPA under the Bush Administration has stood for Every Polluter's Ally. The air and the water and the land are viewed by this administration as just another commodity to be used for private profit. We as a nation must turn our efforts towards the great work of restoring our air and our water and our land. We must view our natural resources as the common property of all humanity -- even more, as the commonwealth of all humanity. And so my candidacy arises from a philosophy of interdependence and interconnection, which respects the environment as a precondition for our survival.

I am not tied to any corporate interests that would strip our forests or pollute our air or water. Throughout my career, I have worked for structures of law that protect the environment, and the principles that animate my campaign are principles of sustainability. The principles that animate my life are principles of sustainability.

I have a long and consistent record of working for protecting the environment. I was active in helping draft the first environmental law protecting the air, as a member of the Cleveland City Council 30 years ago. I led the effort in Ohio challenging nuclear power as being unsafe, unreliable, and unsustainable, and I'm still leading the effort in challenging it. And, most recently, I was at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg, advocating a plan with Mikhail Gorbachev for a Global Green Deal that would enable the introduction of $50 billion of new solar projects around the world. It will be a major initiative to use our country's leadership in sustainable energy production to provide jobs to Americans, to reduce energy use here at home, and to partner with developing nations to provide their people with inexpensive, local renewable-energy technologies.

As a peace advocate, I hope to launch a major renewables effort so that Middle East oil fields do not loom so large as strategic or military targets. There has to be a renewable energy portfolio of 20% by 2010. And that means introducing wind, solar, hydrogen, geothermal, biomass, and all of the options that must be available and need incentivizing. That also means withdrawing incentives for the production of nonrenewable energy. I'm not talking about building new hydro dams; I'm not talking about damming up more rivers and streams.

We need to subsidize the development of new energy technologies. And I'm willing to do that through NASA, which has been of singular importance to our economy by developing technologies for propulsion, for aerospace, for materials, for medicines, and for communication. We need to fund NASA in, among other areas, a mission to planet Earth.

The United States should lead the way in protecting our oceans, rivers and rural environments -- and I have been speaking out on these issues across America. I will also continue to lead in fighting for clean, affordable, and accessible drinking water -- which is an emerging global concern. Over the years, I have worked hand in hand with the environmental movement on many battles, from thwarting a nuclear waste dump to boosting organics to demanding labels on genetically-engineered products. I've won honors from the Sierra Club, Friends of the Earth, and the League of Conservation Voters.

In the summer of 2002, I was one of the few U.S. officials at the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg. To repair the earth, America must lead. We must reverse course on most Bush Administration policies and support the Kyoto Treaty that Bush rejected. We must strengthen environmental laws and increase penalties on polluters. We should provide tax and other incentives to businesses that conserve energy, retrofit pollution prevention technologies, and redesign toxins out of their manufacturing processes. Nontoxic, safe substitutes for hazardous chemicals must become permanent.

I would initiate a "Global Green Deal" to use our country's leadership in sustainable energy production to provide jobs at home, increase our independence from foreign oil, and aid developing nations with cheap, dependable, renewable energy technologies like wind and solar. A clean environment, a sustainable economy, and an intact ozone layer are not luxuries, but necessities for our planet's future."

Answer 9

When I think of top issues, the environment isn't one of them.
1) Global war on terror
2) Economy
3) Restoration of morals and values
4) Abortion
5) Gay marriage

These are the issues that are important.

Answer 10

The one I'm not voting for.