http://games.espn.go.com/nba/features/traderesult?players=2377~2381~285~2435~1007~1018&teams=1~1~1~1~30~4&te=&cash=
2007-08-08 10:11:24 · 7 answers · asked by LeBron Michaels 1 in Sports ➔ Basketball
The Bulls would love a full-time shooting guard with length, but neither Johnson or Richardson are 'true' clutch players like Gordon. who is always high on the list of most fourth quarter points per game. Richardson is a streaky player and not much of a passer. Johnson is versatile, but a poor defender and not much of a leader. Gordon is obviously vertically challenged, but gets the most out of his skills. Plus, regardless of Gordon's stature, he's a lot tougher then the other two.
2007-08-08 12:26:46 · answer #1 · answered by Nick C (IT'S SHOWTIME!!) 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
Please stop using this if you are closed mind and only care about you team.
Why couldn't the Bulls take Joe Johnson over Richardson? Johnson is better than Richardson. The Bobcats are ok with what they have right now. They aren't going to traded anybody.
2007-08-08 17:22:16 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nah. Ben Gordon is somehat similar to J-Rich. Plus he's not the inside presence they're looking for.
2007-08-08 17:18:34 · answer #3 · answered by Blahblah 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, these trade ideas are only in the author's interests. Every single trade idea on yahoo I've seen was pretty ridiculous.
2007-08-08 18:55:16 · answer #4 · answered by Worlds Greatest Armchair Warrior 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not at all the hawks made a big mistake
2007-08-08 17:17:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no the bulls dont really want to give up their future in gorden and duhon.
2007-08-08 18:58:07 · answer #6 · answered by Aaron Smith 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
fair... but no
2007-08-08 22:02:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋