Did ancient Africans travel to Asia?

Question

or anywhere else in the world?

Answer 1

Definitely. Ancient Africans are responsible for the discovery of most parts of the world, which is why there are different races (or rather what we think of as races). The evolutionary processes that resulted from adaptation to so many different environments would not have occurred had the ancient Africans not migrated. Just consider the evidence: #1) The oldest archaeological findings- structures, artifacts, "portraits", etc...- were created by black Africans. #2) There are no biologically distinct groups. This would be true even if "race mixing" had never occurred post environmental adaptation. Physical characteristics vary more WITHIN "races" than they do between them.

There are many who argue that all of the above is merely theory rather than fact. But, be that as it may, those of us with common sense, and non-prejudicial attitudes, are willing to weigh the evidence and accept what the scales tell us.

Answer 2

Yes, for one thing all humans are actually in some manner descended from ancient Africans.
There is also very good evidence that the Kurgan people, fore-runners of the Aryans had among them black gene lines. The Kurgans are probably best thought of as a culture group not as a racial or ethnic group.
Africans almost certainly sailed to and used land routes to visit or settle in most parts of the world including Asia, Australia and South America during pre-historic times as well as ancient times as did many other gene types.

Answer 3

Yeah, you need to read books by Runoko Rashidi & Ivan Van Sertima. Contrary to what's taught in the mainstream, Africans have more than just a legacy of slavery. There are both black & white authors who say the conspiracy to keep the accomplisments of blacks or africans hidden is a VERY real one. But of course there are people who think its logical that africans have existed since the beginning of mankind with thousands of tribes speaking thousands of languages yet never experienced civilization until you know who showed up.

Answer 4

yes......the worlds population as we know it is based on the existence of ancient africans......that's the mother land don't you know....? Seriously, at the time of the ancient migrations, the world's continents were combined, and that's how the natives got to america, and the aborigines to australia and so on, because by the time the continents drifted apart, the indiginous tribes of people were already on their lands. Whites were in cold climates (or caves...lol) and that's why their white, darker folks were in warmer climates, and that's why we are kissed by the sun......we are beautiful creatures aren't we.?....bk

Answer 5

Yes. I believe in the theory that all peoples originated from Africa. Through migration, these people lived in Asia and other lands.

Answer 6

Yes. To South America too. They just traded and went back home.

Answer 7

Yes they did, both willingly in the beginning and unwillingly during later times. Dig, you will find out for yourself.

Answer 8

technically yes. when the earth was newer all the continents were pretty much stuck together so yah - i forget what it was called but look at this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continent
Africa and Eurasia were stuck together

Answer 9

I think they did. If they didn't the only human beings would be found in Africa.

Answer 10

mmmm, are you studying for ur history class? lol, but to answere your question, yes...