English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-08-08 09:07:50 · 17 answers · asked by scottfreefunny 2 in Politics & Government Elections

After having Olberman and Stephanopolis wouldnt it be balanced to have Oreilley and Hannity do the next two

2007-08-08 09:09:58 · update #1

17 answers

Great idea. He may question a bit strong but I believe that some of the republican candidates would make it though looking great and some not so much. A the same time all the Democrats would be forced to answer real tough questions and would end up loosing a lot of support from the voters (that is why the dems would never take part). It would be nice if O'Rielly could force the truth out of them all.

2007-08-08 09:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Pro-American 3 · 2 1

Since all the moderators to date (Olbermann, Matthews, Stepanopolous) are Dem water boys, only pitching softballs... some balance would be nice. O"reilly might be a little much, though. Maybe Brit Hume or Chris Wallace.

2007-08-08 16:19:58 · answer #2 · answered by nileslad 6 · 3 0

Oh yeah. That's a great idea... Just picture it:

O'Reilly: So Governor Richardson, can you explain to the American people why you are such a bad governor?

Richardson: I can assure you, Bill, and all of the good people of the great state of New Mex...

O'Reilly: Shut up! Just SHUT UP! You're in the NO SPIN ZONE, and I'm not going to let you run off on some progressive secularist rant!

Richardson: ...ico...

O'Reilly: That's it, cut his mike! Cut it off!

pause

O'Reilly: Now, I have a question for THIS guy. This former mayor of Cleveland...

2007-08-08 16:29:30 · answer #3 · answered by cheaper than food 2 · 4 2

THAT WOULD BE SO COOOOOL!!!!!

High ratings are definitely guaranteed!

I suspect Hillary is benefitting in the polls right now because hardly anybody is actually watching the debates today. Hillary is where she is due to the low ratings.

I think the poster above me just got back from a long overseas trip.

2007-08-08 17:30:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

yes bill would be good !oh by the way has this country bought into the idea that fair and balanced is now too far to the right, when nobody says a thing about ABC,NBC,CBS,and CNN being far left or think they are fair and balanced? give me a break!

2007-08-08 16:44:05 · answer #5 · answered by roadrunner 3 · 2 1

I love it finally someone who will ask real questions and not allow bloviating by the candidates. No question he would be fair and here is the key

MAKE THEM ANSWER THE ACTUAL QUESTIONS

these candidates are getting away with murder

2007-08-08 20:14:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The chicken s Defeatocrats are too yellow to go on Fox~

2007-08-08 19:48:52 · answer #7 · answered by Classic96 4 · 1 0

I could see him in a debate but not as a moderator.

2007-08-08 16:13:17 · answer #8 · answered by carneypride 2 · 1 0

Bill Oreilly is my hero all the time, i don't like it when Michelle takes over for him. I wish Kirsten Powers would take his place once in a while :)

He's good for republican and democrat debates. Last night he was against 2 democratic women.

O'Reilly would NOT be too much for anyone, what are you ridiculous in thinking that way for!

2007-08-08 16:11:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

Absolutely NOT!!

He would interupt those who didn't express FAUX News views.

It would just be a great waste of hot air and time.

2007-08-08 18:50:41 · answer #10 · answered by jswnwv 3 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers